That speaks more to the level of Ngannou in comparison to his competitors than anything else, and if he could beat someone who has had the same amount of training as himself that speaks to innate talent and good genetics over anything else. My argument was more pertaining to, say; an average man and woman of 5'10" and 170lbs with the same level of experience and conditioning.
Both men and women are capable of being aggressive and violent when the need arises. While is true that men are generally stronger than women it doesn't mean a woman can't fight a man. A lot depends on social conditioning from childhood. In many parts of the world, parents begin this conditioning in the way their children play and socialize. Boys are given toy guns, soccer balls, or footballs to play and compete in sports. Girls, on the other hand, are given dolls, dollhouses, "princess" outfits, toy mirrors, and interact with similar girls. This conditioning creates a behavior pattern that is carried into adulthood.
Conditioning, however, works the other way as well. A friend of mine, an Israeli instructor, is an excellent Krav Maga fighter, and she looks just like any other woman, except she can fight better than most men. She was an IDF soldier, like many Israeli fighters in our locale, and now trains men and women in Krav Maga. She is a perfect example that women can not only fight men but definitely have a chance in beating men in a real fight. But people like herself, Ngannou, and Nunez are shifting the goal posts towards the maximum possible performance of one given particularly skilled professional individual rather than two average fighters.
There's a plethora of other factors to take into consideration of course. But yes, this argument will continue to go in circles if you wish to insist on the idea that men are innately better fighters at the same level of height, size, weight, and training. So I will agree to disagree.