Patreon LogoYour support makes Blue Moon possible (Patreon)

Post Your Face!

About to go to bed. In some pj's. Also remembered something about come to the dark side, we have cookies and realized I was wearing the shirt to bed. Lol. XD

IMG00073.jpg


IMG00074.jpg
 
Trygon said:
Corporal Bunny said:
Doubt what?
The authenticity of that photo.


The photo was taken by my best friend while I was promoting the University of Nottingham alternate film society at the Freshers' fair. I have plenty more photos if you want, just not as many that show off my corseted waist so nicely. :<
 
With the movie posters, what looked like an event listing, and the table in front of you (not to mention the other tables visible off to the side and the people milling about), I figured it was some kind of display or fair event. No worries, not all of us are as reflexively dubious as Trygon and Raz.

University of Nottingham, hm? I remember liking Nottingham when my family visited in 1982. I was 11 at the time. We were living just outside of Grantham for a quarter, and actually, I have more memories of Nottingham than I do of Grantham. And more memories of Bath than both of those other towns combined. Odd how memory works.
 
LOL

People in Michigan forget to drive in the snow. Otherwise, I wouldn't care. I mean, fuck I can drive easily in it so why the fuck can't everyone remember hwo to drive? It's not like it only snows once every ten years. ygwbesownhvown
 
vampire seduction said:
AAHHHHHHHHHHHHH WTF IS THIS BULLSHIT

Pic.jpg


Post me some, please? :3



MM: Those were probably the three most painful days of my life. I'm the society vice-president (or President of Vice, guaranteed to bring every conversation down into the gutter), and somehow I ended up sitting there from 10am to 4am for the 3 days the fair lasted. It was hilarious, so many people approached the stall just to stare at the corset/my tits. But I was also fucking pissed off that so many people did not turn up for their shifts.

I've never actually been to Grantham, I mostly live in Beeston. ^^;
 
missedstations said:
Those were probably the three most painful days of my life. I'm the society vice-president (or President of Vice, guaranteed to bring every conversation down into the gutter), and somehow I ended up sitting there from 10am to 4am for the 3 days the fair lasted. It was hilarious, so many people approached the stall just to stare at the corset/my tits. But I was also fucking pissed off that so many people did not turn up for their shifts.

I've never actually been to Grantham, I mostly live in Beeston. ^^;
You are, in fact, speaking to a certifiable film buff. Yes, I mean that as it reads. Hell, just last night I watched the Frank Miller "Spirit," all the way through, voluntarily! That should show you I enjoy questionable movies.

Which isn't to say I don't also enjoy quality, it's just my tastes are wide. But my point in bringing this up is, you want film discussion, we have many options. ^^

That sucks about your tits. SHIFTS! That sucks about people not showing up for their shifts with your tits. I MEAN AT THE BOOTH! Sorry. I shouldn't keep bringing up your delectable tits. I MEAN CORSET! I MEAN...

YES, I'M AWESOME!

<runs away>
 
I'm not exactly a film buff - I can't quote all the cult movies like some people I know, but I watch a lot of foreign films especially, and I love movies overall. Problem with running an alternate film society means, that sadly, if the film's too obscure no one turns up, and people hate reading subtitles. (It means I can't really indulge my foreign film love, although I got us to show Ché parts I and II this term.) So it's reeeaaaally hard to pick films. I was president last year and everyone always hated my choices, and I thought that that's my fault. But then the current president gets lots of hate as well, so I guess not. xD Can't please everyone.

But yeah, some film discussion would be awesome. :D
 
missedstations said:
Trygon said:
Corporal Bunny said:
Doubt what?
The authenticity of that photo.


The photo was taken by my best friend while I was promoting the University of Nottingham alternate film society at the Freshers' fair. I have plenty more photos if you want, just not as many that show off my corseted waist so nicely. :<
How about a photo of you with your username and the web site on a sign? Of course, if that really is you, that brings more questions to my mind.

$5 on broken camera/why should I/other trite excuse.

Mr Master said:
No worries, not all of us are as reflexively dubious as Trygon and Raz.
Tell me, MM, with the amount of research I put into everyone on this site, why would you think my dubiousness was 'Reflexive'?
 
You are at this point naturally dubious, I would imagine. It's your job to question people's veracity as far as their age, and sometimes it takes a while for you to twig to it, but when something strikes your suspicion, you investigate. Therefore, you are training yourself by nature of the job to be doubtful of people's claims. I would hazard to guess that you tend to doubt everything a newcomer says or does until they've proven something about themselves. In that respect, your suspicious reactions have become reflexive. That's the aspect I'm talking about. I'm not saying it's not deserved, or not a good thing, but it doesn't always pay off. I'm sure you were reflexively suspicious of me, did the investigation, and have ceased being quite so suspicious of me by this point. But it was there at the first, is the thing.

See, to me, it strikes me that for this kind of site, for the kind of interests she has, missedstations might choose a shot like that for the reasons she stated; it's the one she has on hand that shows off her corset in the way she likes best. But then I'm more likely to take people at their word until they've given me reason to suspect, and the fact that it's an attractive picture does not in itself constitute reason, in my mind.

I'm more wondering why you would voice a doubt, unless you've already done research, in which case I would wonder why you're bothering to be coy about it. From what I've seen, if you've got proof that someone's not what they say they are, you call them out on it. Withholding information is not the same as lying, though. So if she's lying, you'd publish your findings, but if she's not, then I don't know why you're calling this into question in the first place. Do you just not know? Is the questioning and voicing a doubt without presenting your evidence (as I've seen you do elsewhere) more of a fishing expedition? Because otherwise it just seems mean.
 
While MM does have a point on the matter, I've seen trygon in action enough to know that he likes playing with his prey at times.

And I am not reflexively dubious. I just saw a questionable picture, though nothing of it until Trygon pipped up, then put my own opinion forward.
 
Raziel99 said:
While MM does have a point on the matter, I've seen trygon in action enough to know that he likes playing with his prey at times.

And I am not reflexively dubious. I just saw a questionable picture, though nothing of it until Trygon pipped up, then put my own opinion forward.
See, why is the picture questionable? You mentioned the background, but when I saw the background, the very first time I saw the picture, I came to the conclusion it was something like what she said it was. Seriously, what sets off the warning bells in your brain?
 
Mr Master said:
Raziel99 said:
While MM does have a point on the matter, I've seen trygon in action enough to know that he likes playing with his prey at times.

And I am not reflexively dubious. I just saw a questionable picture, though nothing of it until Trygon pipped up, then put my own opinion forward.
See, why is the picture questionable? You mentioned the background, but when I saw the background, the very first time I saw the picture, I came to the conclusion it was something like what she said it was. Seriously, what sets off the warning bells in your brain?
I saw the background and instantly thought on the set for a movie.
 
Back
Top Bottom