Patreon LogoYour support makes Blue Moon possible (Patreon)

Dungeons and Dragons (DnD) 3.5, anyone? : OOC Chatter

Status
Not open for further replies.
I dunno. I feel like a fighter or paladin becoming a mouse would be even funnier
 
Which means rogue is Squirrel, by Redwall standards. Otters are... Swashbucklers, Badgers are Barbarians (Rage), and hares are Rangers.

Now I wanna do a Redwall campaign...
 
I would be up for a Redwall campaign. I love that world.

Also couldn't some hare's be unarmed focused fighters or some kind of weird monkish thing?

And what about the Salamandastron(I think that's how it's spelled) Badger? He kind of seems like a paladin/barbarian.
 
Also foxes are witches (from pathfinder. I'm sure you could adopt that to 3.5, or just adopt the 3.5 stuff to Pathfinder as it's basically 3.75)
 
True for barbarian/paladin badger lord. That's most badgers in the series, actually. Hares are variable, with most 'Hero' hares having unarmed fighting skill. But they as a whole use weapons. Redwallers would mostly be Druids, Squirrels would be scouts, but yeah, shrews would be duelists. Otters would be rogues then. Edit: Foxes could be sorcerers as well, the ones that aren't rogues.
 
I would argue most of the redwallers are monks to some degree, as it fits the fact that it's an abbey. Monks or monkish fighters in terms of class if they are heroic. But then most of them would probably be midish level experts.
 
But they are all healers, is the thing. So some could be monks, but the majority heal, thus Druid, since it's nature based. Unless Martin counts as a deity...
 
I wouldn't drink much if you have nothing else in your system before bed anyway. But then I'm a real light weight sooooo... >.>
 
So... How would we set this up? Some people start in Salamandstron, some in Redwall? I call dibs on DMing Redwall campaign! Unless the lovely Lady Bunny would want to DM it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom