Patreon LogoYour support makes Blue Moon possible (Patreon)

Fetishistic Language

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think there are a few things to consider about BMR and forums like it:

- This forum is for people who have very niche, deep, describe however you want fetishes and kinks. There are other places where people can write lighter stuff. Romance novellas about a secretary who fell in love with a CEO, and some of it here too. But also – a lot of other things.
- And a lot of fantasies that we have here, well, they will offend or disgust a lot of other people. Or at least summon a "WTF, is this a thing?" emotion.
- A lot of things we write about here, are well, naughty. We are not supposed to be proud of them. I'd love to eat a tub of ice cream, I should not be proud of my love for enormous amounts of ice cream. Same with this forum – this is an escape into the recess of our minds, that we don't necessarily need to be proud of. Yet they bring us pleasure.
- Futas are not trans. They are mythical characters, like demons. I understand some people might mix them up, but I think most of us understand what is it.

It might make sense to split the forum into non-binary and mythical-non-binary creatures. But I don't think this thread started as constructive, it started with an attack on people's deepest fantasies. Maybe another attempt would work better.
 
Last edited:
I have no real horse in this race as I don't use the language or respond to posts that use the language described in OP, but I think it should be a relatively safe thing to just presume that all language used in the 'official' titles, headers and other texts written 'in the name of' the BMR staff/developers/administration should be written to be as neutral as possible as a rule. It is, after all, the goal to ensure that all writers feel welcome here as a baseline, or at least from the perspective of the website itself (functionally). Removing terminology like 'futa', which has been known to fetishize an identity, and which has been discussed previously on a lot of kink-related spaces, isn't a particularly radical move in my opinion and it would further the inclusion of everyone onto this website. Think about it, how strange would it be to add 'this is where you write about BBCs!' to a header/subtext for a section because it is clearly fetishizing language + it just has no added value, whether writing about that is OK or not OK.

And we already do this, as a community: most people write about non-consensual scenario's, not rape. We already police our own language and everyone understands why we're doing this.

Asking people to change their language is a culture/community thing, and just not something that can be administrated (who decides what's not OK? what should the punishments be?) nor do I think that that is being advocated. I think a lot of people went into this (at least based on reading the posts here) thinking that OP wants to force people to stop using it. Rather I read it as a 'hey I think this is fetishizing my identity, and I don't like it' which is a totally fair point to make to which my counterpoint is to just not RP with those people who use that terminology. I write about things that are strange and I would totally respect anyone's decision not to write with me because of the subject matter I choose to engage in. I regularly choose not to write with people on a variety of things far less serious than 'they fetishize my identity' ranging from their use of colored text to using emojis... I think you can get away with not writing with fetishists without feeling like a jerk.

What worries me about this thread isn't necessarily the content (good discussion to have) but rather how combative some people seem to be. I understand some degree of combativeness as the subject matter is, well, serious and often close at heart for people but I am worried that at this point the argument in the thread is just there because both side feels like the other has a big metal plate in front of their head and refuses to see reason. Not to make a 'can't we all just get along!?' centrist argument here, but at this point there really doesn't seem to be any movement besides people ventilating their opinions endlessly. It reads a bit like that thread on changing the appropriate ages on the website from 15 to 16.
 
I'm just here to watch the carnage.
giphy.gif


Type beat.
 
Do you see how messy and slippery it can get?
The slippery slope argument is a logical fallacy.

Futas are not trans. They are mythical characters, like demons. I understand some people might mix them up, but I think most of us understand what is it.
But I don't think this thread started as constructive, it started with an attack on people's deepest fantasies. Maybe another attempt would work better.
No one has adequately explained how the way that "futa" is used on this website differs from a trans woman, aside from the fact that she doesn't need HRT to develop the way she does.

And, an ATTACK? On people's fantasies? My request that those who care enough to do so use language that I don't find uncomfortable. Politely. Civilly. Without any antagonism. Would you care to explain how I have attacked anyone?
Rather I read it as a 'hey I think this is fetishizing my identity, and I don't like it' which is a totally fair point to make to which my counterpoint is to just not RP with those people who use that terminology.
That is a correct assessment. And this is already what I do. However, as I've said before, avoiding those people only helps me. It does not help the next trans person who joins this community.

At the wonderful recommendation of others at the beginning of this thread, I'm ignoring Sync. They are not engaging in this conversation in good faith.
 
No one has adequately explained how the way that "futa" is used on this website differs from a trans woman, aside from the fact that she doesn't need HRT to develop the way she does.
Is that what you’re trying to push then? A more adequate explanation of the difference between the term “Futa” and a trans woman somewhere on BM?
 
Is that what you’re trying to push then? A more adequate explanation of the difference between the term “Futa” and a trans woman somewhere on BM?
I'm pushing for people to be more cognizant of their language, and to refer to trans women as such. If people are seeking to write characters that have both sets of genitals, then using the term would be fine by me, and definitionally correct. My issue is that the culture here is to refer to what are effectively trans women by a demeaning, objectifying term to treat them as a fetish.

But also, I'm not trying to push for any change to policy, which I have reiterated several times. I've encouraged removal of the words from official BMR text, but only because the Staff indicated an interest in being more welcoming to people like me. I don't have a solution, beyond asking people to think about how they use the language and which words they choose.
 
Oh wow.

Okay, so. I had planned on leaving this topic alone because it's already gotten so heated, but, as someone who has trans friends and loved ones and considers herself an ally to the LGBT community, I wanna weigh in here.

I admit, I don't have much stake in this, being a white cis woman, although not completely a hetero one, I hadn't given it much thought until you brought it up. I've been mulling it over since I saw the precursor to this thread in the Questions subforum, and, well, I agree with you. Marginalized identities (be they racial or what have you) shouldn't be spoken of in a fetishistic manner, and the term "futa" always kind of gave me the ick and I couldn't put my finger on why, since it really doesn't affect me.

The problem I think you're running in to is that this is considered a kink site to many, writing or no, fantasy or no, and is subject to the sort of vernacular you'd see on porn sites. As such, people are railing against feeling like their language is being policed. I'm not saying it is, but I think that is where you're hitting a wall with some of these people. As writers, we ought to know that words have power and meaning, and reducing someone's identity down to being a fetish is kind of gross.

There's a lot of good points being made on either side. I won't acknowledge how hostile some folks are being- that's just unpleasant and I want no part in it.

My question is, what would you like there to be in terms of an alternative? Would you prefer people police themselves a little better and not ask for certain things at all (specifically in the realm of referring to trans women as futas, or does this extend to all things, like asking for non-con?) I completely understand where you're coming from, but I'd like to find a middle ground we can all agree with.
 
My question is, what would you like there to be in terms of an alternative? Would you prefer people police themselves a little better and not ask for certain things at all (specifically in the realm of referring to trans women as futas, or does this extend to all things, like asking for non-con?) I completely understand where you're coming from, but I'd like to find a middle ground we can all agree with.
I think we were typing at the same time! Did my above post answer your question? I can elaborate if need be! I really don't mind answering questions.

As an aside, I was in not insignificant pain yesterday (my kidneys are building a rock collection), so if I came across a bit more snippy, I do apologize.
 
That is a correct assessment. And this is already what I do. However, as I've said before, avoiding those people only helps me. It does not help the next trans person who joins this community.

Unfortunately, while I understand the sentiment and do agree with it to a degree, I also think it is untenable to change this aspect of the community. We are in a community that is essentially a goon-cave for people that can read. In other words, this is a website catering to, at the furthest extent of its reach, not only smut, not only kinks, but fetishes. And unfortunately some people do fetishize entire identities. It's halfway a literary porn site, people will use porn terms. Anyone who writes about uncomfortable topics/topics that include isms for example, will know that you have to basically vet your partners to ensure they're not radical nutjobs that actually believe the things you're writing about.

And that is, unfortunately, also part of what writing in a community like this entails. There are a lot of people on writing sites in general that I personally find strange and uncomfortable (the aforementioned "we're raising the minimum age from 15 to 16" thread was an eye-opener to me, for example, with how strong some people reacted to the change). I don't engage with those people because they are strange and uncomfortable. People probably think the same way about me. It's ok. That's what writing forums are about. You will have the same experience on other websites.

But I also get the sneaking suspicion that the crowd that uses those words isn't going to be reading this thread anyway. Why would they? They're here to write about their fetish and get their porn fix. 🤷‍♂️ They don't care. So now you're reaching the audience that engages with Blue Moon Academy, who I think are generally just more interested in having a fun argument debate... as one prevalent voice in here already said 'I don't write about this/use this terminology but I want to have an opinion anyway.' Is that what spurns 4 pages of discussion? lol

Also, this is a more general side point, but I want to ask the people who are being sort of condescending and sarcastic with people on both side of the argument what exactly in that approach they think will convince the other side, actually you're right.
 
Hey there everyone. I've been watching this thread from the beginning, and sincerely thought about responding way back when it was just KittKatt who had posted, but hesitated to do so as this conversation is quite obviously loaded and very hard to not get emotional about. Talking about it will also require me to be a bit more honest about my own identity what I'm doing here, and feelings that I'm not entirely sure I want to prod. Yet this conversation has blown up, and I on some level feel uniquely qualified to talk about it. I apologize in advance if I get too emotionally charged; some of the argumentation and ideas on both sides has gotten me a bit worked up in ways that I usually don't come on Bluemoon to do.

I mention being uniquely situated because I'm a member of the LGBT community who discovered much of that identity through the exploration of various erotic ideas and fetishes. I've also had quite serious discussions regarding sexuality, identity, and the like as a result of roleplaying in general and erotic roleplaying in specific. I also also have a doctorate in Queer Studies. I also also also have utilized and still utilize fetishistic language in some of my RPs, though I usually try to acknowledge that there can be an inherent problem in doing so, particularly as it relates to various people's bodies. Sometimes I do feel a bit of guilt at being aroused by various parts like that, but at the same time I examine that arousal and try to determine why the aspects of certain things do that for me. In my case, for example, I have a fetish wherein I like if there's some sort of "additional consequence" for orgasm, which often leads to breeding and the like, which is usually more drastic if said breeder has some sort of more inherent difference to them.

I use Bluemoon to work out some of my desires and fantasies and to cater to them, as it helps me channel some of my thoughts and ideas. I also admit that while I'm not totally comfortable with Dion's just mentioned "goon-cave," I'd be lying if I don't often treat Bluemoon that way.

Yet one of my more reocurring thread ideas, one that ironically this thread is tempting me to revive, involves utilizing a group of Dungeons and Dragons characters (and here's where I'm actually getting to my point, which kinda proves the whole academic thing and that I'm overly wordy). In that, I was considering what sort of characters I usually like in DnD and thinking about the fact that DnD has gotten increasingly LGBT+ friendly. I wanted my roster to reflect that and, yes, I also wanted my roster to be made of individuals who arouse me and who I could portray being aroused by others in turn (RPing helped me figure out I'm pansexual). During this I considered the fact that I like transgender women, particularly those that are concerned with their feminine appearance and my have issues. I wanted the almost classic sexy elf who just happens to have the wrong body to match her perception of herself and may even be adventuring to figure out how to utilize magic to transition. This started primarily because I honestly just find elves hot, but ended up with a sort of exploration of that concept.

I initially was reluctant to even write a trans character, as I'm not sure if I'm trans or what. Yet I also was struggling with the fact that I outright find transgender people attractive. I wanted to explore that aspect of myself, so I did research regarding trans people in pornography and erotica, how they were portrayed, and whether it was alright for me to be writing a trans character in a horny setting. Most of it was about being cautious, but about how it's also important to desire the trans body and personality as much as the cis, because they're human as well (even if my elf is, y'know, an elf).

In that I also found arguments that futa were essentially a hyper sexualized version of trans females that had been utilized in erotica for some time. This was part of what helped give me the extra encouragement to continue writing my transgender elf character and to use her experience to explore those desires and issues. As I was planning with people, I got several RPs that involved this character (her name is Nia, and I'm just going to use it for ease). One of them was absolutely fantastic, wherein her partner found out about her situation and was quite loving, engaging in a sexual but mutually caring relationship. It had developed naturally over the course of the RP (we had both discussed Nia and her eventual partner with other people first). It turned me on, because the sex was hot and I was writing a hot elf chick, but it also made me think about how trans sexuality. During that RP I also had discussions regarding the value we put on virginity, whether or not open relationships work, and how a character designed pretty much to be horny was essentially racist against orcs because she wanted the classic orc fantasy.

I also had conversations regarding Nia with other partners. In those, I had several who said they weren't interested in Nia if she was a transgender woman, but would be comfortable if she were a futa. We discussioned the distinction there, which comes to an earlier point about futa being something of a fictional creature. To what this author said, futa were a highly sexualized portrayal of something, creatures that were naturally born that way and didn't have the usual issues regarding body dismorphia and gender identity that usually come with the trans experience. It was about portraying this sexualized sort of fantastical, third gender.

That is, as I understand it, what those utilizing the term are trying to get across. The futa is a sort of confident, uber-sexual being that goes around utilizing their big cock to fuck cis men and women alike. They are a bold embodiement of sexuality in that case.

It's also kinda like the Mandingo? That would be the hyper-sexualized version of the black man that's birthed from old shock films of I believe the 70's (doctorate's in queer studies, not race relations!). They're a hyper masculine being with an oversized cock that goes about fucking all da white wimmin. It's a sexual fantasy and it's sort of extended into a lot of the modern portrayal of blacks in erotica and porn that is almost definitely problematic. It's also a fetish that I have actively engaged in to the point where I have an alternate account that just does those RPs (and I admit to being a bit concerned to openly admitting as such here).

That's likely where a lot of the issue being discussed here comes from, though I don't want to explain anyone's experience or the like. Futa is utilized as a sort of sexual fantasy that can be inherently rooted in homophobic ideas regarding transfemale identity. It's also a specific fetish that's perpetuated by Japanese erotica in particular that's still actively engaged with. And as I believe has been said, if you're aware of that and are engaging, that's probably fine. A lot of what's done here is so we can address our sexual urges and explore them. And futanari definitely has some actual history and identity, which has been indicated and needs to be considered. The issue becomes whether or not directly utilizing that term is inherently charged.

I'd argue that you just have to read this fucking thread to realize there's some charge there.

That being said, there's also a valid argument to consider with the idea that if we overly police language in a site that's, as I still love Dion's phrasing, essentially a goon cave, where does that end? That sort of reasoning pops up every time there's a discussion of rule changes or policy wording or really just about anything. I actually think there's some validity to that, and I'm not just saying that because I like writing monster smut on top of everything else (I've actually written stuff involving monsters that love to breed and fuck women going after transgender characters). Part of what a lot of people like about this site is the freedom. I've been on other sites that do that policing and it makes me utterly terrified to engage with some of my own kinks and issues. At the same time, I clearly overthink about this stuff to a high degree.

But there are examples of cracking down on language and the like potentially leading to issues. I think it's important to acknowledge this does happen. It's important for the staff implementing this rule to think about that, and based on my interactions and what I've read, I think they do.

On the other hand, I think we'd all think it a bit off if there was a subheading about Mandingo RPs being present here. Having literally the first word under the non-binary section being a sexually charged phrase like that could very well throw people off. Those are people who could be going to that section looking to write about literal non-binary experience (I have non-binary characters and have also looked into non-binary sexuality, partly because I am both horny and quite possibly non-binary myself). It made sense to have that word there when we were less aware, as it acknowledges a common fetish creation that is utilized a lot in erotic RPs, particularly those who engage with anime, which is a chunk of this site. It's also a bit offputting to have it right there in front. It's one thing if it's used in a thread or the like; it's another if it's used right in the section where we're asking people to go and RP.

I also want to say that I think KittKatt started this in good faith, and that they have proven time and time again that they really want to talk about this sort of thing and that they're trying to listen to the other side. Their goal was to start a meaningful discussion around terminology and how it's utilized and to get people thinking about it, as well as to potentially present perspectives regarding a current situation on the site which staff may want to consider. I do think they may have started from a bit of a defensive stance, but they were also open about that, and, well, the word is literally right there in the descriptor guys. Plus the whole point of this is to indicate that the term has gained some charge over the years and may need to be recontexualized as a result of the increased visibility of trans writers.

I'm also almost petrified to say this much about myself, about this topic, and the like, as, again, I kinda primarily use this site to come on, write about weird fantasies I've been having, and get aroused. There is a slight level of kink shaming just inherent in admitting that you like this sort of thing, and it's not helped by the charged tone that some people have been using, where there's often a conflation with "you like and allow this stuff and therefore are a bad person." This topic in particular just got me thinking a lot, as a I do, and I thought my perspective may have some validity. I also may very well refresh my request thread involving those LGBT characters because this got me thinking about that and how i sometimes like having that additional layer to my smut (when I'm not writing about breeding fictional characters or fucking monsters). Also beacuse I like writing about fucking elves. And gnomes. And tieflings. And a lot of things, really.
 
Due to this thread getting severely out of hand and off-topic, it has been decided to close it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom