Patreon LogoYour support makes Blue Moon possible (Patreon)

Sane BDSM (a dom's point of view) (NSFW to be safe)

Tassu

Bloodthirsty Sadist
Joined
Jan 2, 2020
Feel free to engage with the content. This is where I'll be sharing my errant thoughts regarding D/s dynamics in real life. Some of these thoughts are obviously also applicable to roleplay.

Anyhow, I found this rather wholesome Twitter account.

There are no wrong kind of emotions, only wrong actions taken because of said emotions. Validate your partner's emotions, be they ugly are beautifuil. Never tell someone ''you should not feel like that' or 'you can't feel that'. Only challenge people on how they act. Never on how they feel. It's perfectly fine to be jealous, envious and even upset. As long as you do not cause harm.

jpgaWBm.png


I have interacted with plenty of folks who refuse all the praise (or get mental blue screen) when praised, yet crave for affirmation.
Remember, your submissive/dominant needs kind words and affirmation. They are a human too.

O8Rkuxy.png
 
Last edited:
With great power comes great responsibility. As much as dominant can expect and hope the submissive to communicate their needs,
they also need to make sure that the needs are met. This is often less an issue with 'service subs' that only seek to please their dominant.
That doesn't mean that such submissives have no needs. Just as every human being, they need affection and affirmation.

Littles and brats are then often bit different. To be a proper master or daddy, you really need to look after your plaything. While in some ways,
being a dominant gives you access to someone ~as you wish, it also comes with responsibility to make sure that the submissive stays safe and sound.
This often includes a fair amount of mental work and patience that's far less sexy than dragging the submissive on your knee and spanking them.

Being dominant is never really only about rough sex and consensual abuse. Submission is a gift - something to be earned and never to be taken
as granted. A good dominant will earn their submissive's affection by looking after them.

vBfhz7c.png
 
A dominant can certainly force his or her submissive to kneel, if that's at stake. There is joy in primal play, there's joy in putting a brat in his or her place. But just as using physical force is appealing, so is inspiring respect. A dominant who truly cares for their submissive and manages to show it without being overly pushy or wishy-washy will foster near undying loyalty in their submissive. A plenty of people seek safety in submission, a moment of reprieve from their anxieties. Some yield to quiet the voices in their head, not having to worry about doing something wrong or not being enough. If and if dominant can provide that, they can ask almost anything from the submissive and he or she will be happy to oblige.

ar2ZiFb.jpeg
 
This little prompt, likely meant as 'porn' in one way or another, carries two important tidbits for healthy longterm D/s relationship.
Of course these things are relevant in short term as well. But's the longterm relationship where you can get most out of D/s and that's
what I have most experience with. I am not saying that, nasty, kinky encounters are somehow bad or wrong, but you definitely get deeper
into (and more out of) D/s the more you interact with the same person.

The first idea here is that dominant should always have submissinve's best interest in his mind. Sometimes this means degrading face fucking,
sometimes this means a night spent cuddling and watching cartoons. A submissive is not a sex vending machine, but human with his or her hopes,
fears and needs. Needs that must be met, fears that must be alleviated. While you can create a momentary illusion that your submissive is
nothing but your toy, existing only to please you, long term you will need to look after him or her to make this possible.

The second point is that, while submissive should strive to communicate their needs, likes and fears, the dominant must keep his or her eyes and ears open.
One must listen and observed the submissive for no two people are ever the same. One must cherish the gift of submission and show it.
No two submissives are ever the same and one can't easily apply earlier relationships to a new one. No two instruments can be played the same
and submissives are much the same. Care should be taken to understand the person, their needs and their limits, so that you might best use them
for their and your enjoyment.

All this allows the submissive a space where they can be fearlessly themselves and grow as a person. Fucking someone until they weep is hot. But have you ever
considered how hot it is to shape someone into the best version of themselves? Watch them grow and succeed?


the-right-dom.jpg
 
There is no right or wrong depth for D/s relationship. Keeping things in the bedroom is perfectly fine. Expanding the dynamics into everyday life is equally fine. Each relationship will inevitably be shaped by the people involved. Both the dominant and the submissive.

However, the relationship cannot go deeper than trust goes. This works both ways. If dominant doesn't trust the submissive to manage a total power exchange, such a step should not be taken. If the submissive does not trust his or her dominant to manage her diet, the the dominant should not push the issue.

Trust is the basis on which everything else is built, both in vanilla and in D/s relationships.

21b3ac8e930007f1e1717cc9ce130705e95ba6710e1fe64765d9cabc6c2e15d9-1.jpg
 
People (including myself write a plenty) about doms and what makes a good dominant. Perhaps for a reason, for it's the dominant who has the power to fuck the poor submissive over. Also there seems to be a temptation to portray oneself as a dominant in hopes of reaping the benefits (obedient, eager partner) without paying the due diligence (respect and aftercare). Traits that make up a good submissive are discussed less. However, it doesn't mean that there's no skill involved or that submitting would be easy. While I am not a switch (I wish I was), here's my take on the question, looking from a dom's point of view.

What makes a good submissive?

Knowledge and awareness

A good submissive should know what they need, what they desire and what their limits are. If you don't know yourself, there's no way a dom is going to figure you out - or spend time figuring you out, unless there's deeper emotional connection involved. Submissive should know how they want to be touched, how they want to be put to place if that's part of the dynamics and how they want to be addressed. A submissive should know if they want to be humiliated or not - and where their limits are. One person might love being called a cum-dump while another will burst into tears hearing the words. Know yourself.

Communication
A good submissive should be able to communicate the aforementioned needs, desires, and limits clearly and honestly with their dominant. This helps the dominant to trust the submissive to know what they want and what they don't. Nothing is more awkward than being asked to 'dominate me in a sexy way'. What one person finds sexy is abuse to another. A submissive who knows his or her limits and likes and can communicate them comes off very appealing for a dominant who knows what they are doing. Dominants cannot read mind and learning to read someone's body takes months at best. A submissive that lets his/her dominant know what they enjoy is likely a happy submissive. Talk often and hide nothing.

Submission
This may seem obvious, but a good submissive should be willing and eager to submit to their dominant. This means being open to exploring new experiences and pushing their limits within the bounds they are comfortable with. This does not meant that submissive should allow the dom to walk over their hard limits. This merely means that the submissive should be eager to explore things they are uncertain about - and then communicate how they felt. Yield.

Responsibility
A good submissive should take responsibility for their own well-being and safety, as well as for their actions and behavior. This includes being aware of their own limits and communicating them to their dominant. A good submissive also looks after the emotional well-being of the dominant and offers them comfort when needed. Just as sub-drop is a thing, so is dom-drop. Even the one who holds the reins might need a hug and a few reassuring words every now and then. Carry your weight.
 
Doms need aftercare too. A D/s session, regardless its contents can push the dominant into headspace where they are questioning themselves and their humanity. It is not easy to hurt someone or make them cry and bleed and tell yourself that that's alright. That that's perfectly normal thing to do. A dominant might need reassurance too. A dominant should be able to ask for a reasssurance, when they need it. Now obviously you might want to undo the ropes first and check that the sub is safe and sound - and that they are back from their lala-land before you ask for cuddles and kind words.

Don't be afraid to ask your submissive for encouragement. If you are doing everything right, they adore you and will happily oblige.

ihJc23P.png
 
Subdrop and its management


wEKeDsJ.png
7Nr6BwI.jpeg

While I am sure that most people are aware of the term, I am still going to spend a few moments talking about why it happens and how you can handle it. The basic problem with D/s is that, you are not just having sex. You are having sex++. The biological mechanisms underlying arousal are complex and involve many cerebral circuits — meaning that sex taps into very primal parts of our brain. BDSM (or sex) in general is a very, very intense source of norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and histamine. This is to say that having really, really good sex is more or less equal to tripping balls. But instead of doing acid, you are doing five of the seven most important neurotransmitters that mess with your brain. Alcohol, known for 'really fucking up people' only really messes with your γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels. This is to say that, besides the physical dangers involved with BDSM, power/control/pain also comes with mental dangers that should be kept in mind.

Subdrop as per se is basically a set of withdrawal symptoms as the brain and the body return to the base level and all the 'feelgood' stuff slowly leaves the system. This return to normal can feel really uncomfortable and in some causes cause considerable anxiety. That's how brain chemistry works. Feeling 'normal' after feeling 'really good' is programmed to feel 'awful' in our bodies. The 'real' problem with withdrawal symptoms is that the only way to really get rid of them is to return the body to the previous, aroused state. Often this is not feasible — one has to stop to eat and drink at some point and even the most generous sub usually taps out after 20 or so orgasms. Human body can take only so much before things start to break down. Have you ever seen someone get an abrasion on a clit? That is not 'fun times'.

Since 'treating' the withdrawal is usually impractical, usually you can only manage the symptoms. Basically you need to help the person to ground themselves to the present moment. Touch is a good way to remind person of where they are, so all sorts of cuddling, kisses and soft touches likely work well. Instead of trusting my word, you should check with your submissive what they prefer. Offering your submissive some water and snacks also likely helps as intense sex tends to dehydrate person. Making sure that your sub stays warm is also important and that's why all good 'BDSM kits' should include a blanket. I have yet to meet a sub who did not enjoy blanket-hugs while coming down from her high.

The emotional parts of the aftercare should not be neglected either. As the term 'ball of anxiety' describes most subs rather accurately (there are exceptions, primal bottoms and masochists come to mind), offering your partner reassuring words can mean a world to them. You know they did well — so let them know. Words like 'Daddy/master is so proud of you' will sink deep and leave the sub smiling for a good while. I would avoid breathing exercises as some subs struggle to breath while coming down. Sharing your feelings and telling your sub what you enjoyed and what you saw them do might also work well. If you do not live with your sub or talk to them daily, it is advisable to touch bases with them a few times to help them avoid feeling disposable.

eOubyUk.png
GsaftHm.png
 
A slight addendum to the 'What makes a good submissive' tidbit I wrote. I was discussing this little journal with a subby friend the other day. As far as I know she isn't here. While I have been living in a D/s relationship for a 15 years now, I won't claim to know everything. My friend had a pretty good point about someone not being able to know something.

Dominant should not expect the submissive to know everything about themselves. Instead, they should take pleasure in allowing the submissive to discover themselves. They should allow the submissive to explore themselves within the bounds of their relationship.

KZsWEoo.png


While it's important to know yourself, it is also important to know what you don't know and communicate that clearly. 'Sir, I do not know.' is perfectly valid response to any reasonable dominant. If someone insists that you need to know or has no patience to allow you some time to think, you are likely interacting with someone toxic. Submissive peeps deserve the space and the time to figure things out, just like everyone else. :)
 
One should never need to beg for attention in a relationship. Either attention is given, your needs are met and you have a relationship or you don't. No of course just how much time a dominant can give to a submissive is a discussion worth having. There should be some sort of understanding on the frequency and the nature of interactions. If you find yourself in a relationship where your partner has no time for you, you don't have a relationship. This goes for vanilla people as well.

Years ago, I almost messed up my marriage by not being there for her. Don't make the same mistake.

Begging for a permission to cum is then a different story altogether.
All good denied subs should learn to beg properly. ;)

As long as they consent to the denial.

DKym6n3.png
 
Don't make them beg.
Make them *want* to beg, or make them *love* to beg...

But do pay attention when she does, even if you choose to ignore it. Make sure she knowns you're ignoring her on purpose.

You want anyone (me) to beg for ...X... And you're not even paying attention? (A.k.a. on your phone, too busy taking off your shirt, or generally being too selfish to pay attention to me putting my honor out there and begging...) You better find a way to suck your own dick, or beg ME to.

But if you're nice...🌹
 
Don't make them beg.
Make them *want* to beg, or make them *love* to beg...

But do pay attention when she does, even if you choose to ignore it. Make sure she knowns you're ignoring her on purpose.

Pretty much this!

An experienced and skilled dominant who knows his submissive can inspire a lot of devotion. Unless the dynamics of the relationship revolve around forcing your partner to do things (brats, primals), it's entirely possible to treat your sub in such a way that she will yearn to serve you. Ache to serve you.

A good dominant can make his submissive to crave for submission.

That dedication, however, must be earned.

Ignoring someone (and her attempts to get your attention) is something I would discuss in advance, though. There are people who find lack of attention really jarring and upsetting just as there are people who will enjoy the little game and will adore you for it.
 
Honestly so glad I found this thread. Never heard of dom-drop or sub-drop before despite having experienced it myself. (Admittedly, my experience of this stuff has been purely through rp so I don't claim to have been there done that or anything). It's good to have the words for this stuff and a place to read about possible solutions, for all the issues and.. concepts you've mentioned. (oh and the aftercare advice is great too)

Also, thanks for using they/them pronouns for a lot of your discussions btw. I know a lot of bdsm content is male dominated (yes that is a pun), but as someone who looks at this stuff from an FxF perspective, it's easier to read 'their submissive' or 'their dominant' or his/her.. etc. Not that it would've made a difference, this is absolute gold regardless, but it's a sprinkling of some extra good stuff on something that's already really good.

Uh.. yeah just wanted to say this is some really good stuff :)
 
Thank you
Honestly so glad I found this thread.

*snip*
Uh.. yeah just wanted to say this is some really good stuff :)
Thank you for your kind words. :)

I set up this thread for people like you. People who dabble with things, but might have not read much.

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out. I might not answer the same day, but I'll get back to you. I also might be able to recommend you some books. ^_^
 
D/s relationships, whether in real life or online can easily feel transactional, particularly if the dom(me)/sub met as a dom(me)/sub. I suppose this also applies to roleplay. In some ways, many relationships here are transactional. There is nothing inherently wrong with that. No-one is asked to develop feels for the person they are interacting with.

That said, I have found that at least in real life interactions, it's night impossible for the submissive to not develop some feelings for the dominant. I don't strictly mean romantic love or sudden urge to marry their dom(me), but the repeated highs can leave one craving for more. Obviously, dom(me) can develop feelings for someone even in a relatively transactional FWB arrangement.

I am not trying to vouch for 'romantic' interactions as per se. Romance has its place and there's plenty of good sex (and stories) out there without romance. However, if you are playing the long game with your play/writing partner and genuinely want them to stick around, it's good to also connect with them on a human level. It's easy for a sub to feel that they are just a sex or smut dispenser on the whims of their dominat. The same can obviously happen the other way around too.

What I am getting at here is that, even if you have sexual (written or in person) relationship with someone, it's also best to include non-sexual elements to it, if you wish it to last. Not every fling or shared story is meant to last or will last more than its due time. But if you want to build something enduring, you need to put some time and energy into it.

And not just horny energy.

vGYPZ6i.jpeg
 
No. This is just a wank fantasy for submissives. It's 50 Shades for the masses, an idea about as real as the hot MILF wanting to fuck you.
As it happens, actual dominants cannot read minds nor can they talk to you telepathically. If you need something, talk to your dominant. Really.

The right dominant is the one that can communicate with you and respects your limits.

xRRCdVS.jpeg
 
Forced orgasms on a sub with a cock

Alright, this topic is going to be a bit weird considering how I am at best bi-curious and how I highly prefer to play with female subs. But there are plenty enough of subs with penises here and I have talked with some dommes taking their first steps, so I thought that this topic might be of interest to some.

Ok, so let's go over the basic idea. Forced orgasms can be described as a part of BDSM play, where a submissive 'doesn't want to' or 'cannot' orgasm, but is made to anyway by their dominant partner. Simple enough.

Assuming a multi-orgasmic female sub (or sub with a vagina and a clit), forced orgasms do not require much imagination to write or act out in real life. As long as the poor sub is into someone hammering her insides or poking her clit, chances are that they can be made to cum whether or not they want to. The fun part (for the sadistic doms) starts when the poor sub is so sore that they don't want to be touched anymore, but the dom keeps going. The way most (but not all!) female bits work is that the refractory period (i.e. length of time after an orgasm when sexual desire and the ability to have sex temporarily cease) is relatively short, measured in ~tens of seconds.

Do note that there are people with clits who can cum exactly once and will punch you in the face if you keep going. Like any play, forced orgasms should be negotiated with your partner before trying them out.

With that out of the way, lets look at how this works with a male sub. Most folks with a cock are not multi-orgasmic (exceptions exist and in the realm of role-play guys who can keep going after getting off are rather common). The question is, how do you force a someone with a penis to cum again and again if they have such a long refractory period?

Fortunately, penis has two notable workarounds. The poor sub might not agree on how 'fortunate' that fact is, but alas, I digress. Both of the measures are rather uncomfortable for the victim, so you shouldn't probably try those unless your sub/victim is masochistic. It should be noted that both of these methods also work perfectly fine when getting off for the first time, but I am going to focus on the 'forced orgasm' aspect here.

The links below are all very NSFW. You have been warned.

Prostate orgasms
As most people know, it's entirely possibly make someone cum without touching their cock. All you need to do is to apply pressure repeatedly on the prostate, either by fingers or a suitable toy. Or with a cock, if you have one of those. This can be even very pleasant, if the person/sub/victim hasn't cum yet. There is a reason why they sell prostate toys. If you have a prostate and haven't given this a try, I'd recommend trying it.

The 'fun' fact is that prostate doesn't have a strict refractory period. So in theory it's possible to force a someone to cum several times by stimulating the prostate. The problem is that the spongy tissue really sore after the first orgasm and so subsequent orgasms aren't quite as pleasant. They actually suck a fair bit. The female audience can likely relate to this sensation by imaging how it feels to have their clit played with immediately after they cum.

Frenulum orgasms
Less well known 'form' of an orgasm resulting from stimulation of frenulum. Frenulum orgasm is usually best achieved with a strong vibrator (say Hitachi), but massaging the frenulum can also work. If you want to take things slow and torment your sub/victim or engage in tease/denial play with a sub, licking, nibling and gently massaging the frenulum will serve you well.

The 'fun' fact is that even paraplegics can be made to orgasm with frenulum stimulation. They might not feel anything, but it still works - running the signal all the way to the brain is not necessary for the orgasm to occur. Needless to say, this technique can be used to 'milk' the poor submissive at least until their cock gets so numb they can no longer feel the toy. The female audience can likely relate to this sensation by imaging how it feels to have a vibrator against their clits even after getting off.
 
What makes a good dom?
While I am undeniably dominant, chances are that I am not the best authority on what makes a 'good dominant'. While I might have a plenty of experience and a good holistic understanding of D/s dynamics, telling everyone that things that I do make a good dominant is... iffy at best.

That said, I have befriended a number of subs/switches over the years. And so I figured I'd ask them what they think makes a good dominant. Of course there's some selection bias in my sample - we are talking about people willing to talk with me after all. There are probably plenty of submissives out there who don't quite agree on everything mentioned here. And that is perfectly fine. But perhaps we can come up with a rough idea on what makes a great dom.

To avoid the overly studious people writing an essay, I asked the people I know to write 1-2 sentences on the matter. The answers I was given can be seen below. As you can see, someone decided to write an essay anyway. Cat is still very much a good girl. :3


Aardwolf said:
Someone who makes a conscious effort to make me feel appreciated for who I am and what I can do, not what they wish I could be or do. I also think the most important part of being a good dominant as well as a stable person is having control over your own emotions, be those desires or response to stress, Because if you can't control yourself, there's no way I can trust you to try to control someone else.

Badger said:
I would say consistency, self knowledge and self awareness, commitment to principles of consent and humility.

Cat said:
—Is genuine: they clearly enjoy what they are doing and what the sub is providing to the interaction. Most subs are good at reading body language and intention and are not comfortable with "ok, I'll spank you because you want it, but I'm kind of weirded out by this." A masochist might be fine with that, but it's kind of against the grain for d/s

—is perceptive: If you're pushing at edges of what someone can tolerate, you'd better be very good at seeing signs that they're nearly past a limit.

—has plans: They have more power and agency in the moment and have already thought through ways something could go wrong, and what they'd do. There's a lot of subtle ways this reassures a sub that they are 'safe' to let go of certain things with that dom. Are there cushions set where they might otherwise hit their head if they lose consciousness? Is there a non-verbal safeword set up in case they slip past language? But also the feel that each thing has been carefully planned out is comforting in the sense that they may lose control, but their dom has even that all accounted for. And (see above) if they've planned for that, then it's a thing they're comfortable with or even aiming for. —which leads to…

—is accepting: There is something deeply needed by a sub that's fulfilled by that acceptance of them when they're a mess, or they've hit a limit and gone off script or used a safeword.

Dingo said:
Willingness and ability to put aside own ego and expectations. (especially important when it comes to exploring or hitting subs limits) being clear about expectations of the sub. (clear communication). I think these are the foundations for a good Dom on which it can be built upon depending on unique needs and wants of both sub and dom.

Egret said:
Someone that can make me feel desired and cared for, but also use me and is willing to kind of push me, if that makes sense. That's probably the simplest way to put it.

As evident by the replies, good dom is expected to be able to control themselves and to be knowledgeable. Ability to regulate expectations also comes up more than once as does a notion that a sub should be accepted as they are. A dominant pushing edges is also mentioned a few times.

While knowledge is something that only comes with time and practice, self-control and managing one's expectations should both be something even a beginner could strive to master.

I'll note briefly that this was not what I expected. I expected the subs to bring up words like 'honesty', 'respect' and 'accountability'. I was later pointed out that honesty and respect are basic necessities and thus not something that makes a great or good dom. Food for thought, considering I have known one of these subs for 15 years.

Self-control
BrU9wGW.png
A dominant should never ever lash out in anger. It's fine to be upset and disappointed with your submissive. D/s relationships are no different from any other relationships. Sometimes you get upset with your partner. However, using the power you have been handed to punish your submissive for interpersonal conflict is not fine. It's abuse. If you are upset with your submissive, you should always address the matter in-person outside the D/s dynamic. This goes for both RL play and roleplay.

Funishments (fun punishments) are entirely different story. A sub that's agreed to try their best to not cum during play and ends up cumming anyway, has deserved whatever punishment they have consented to. This sort of play is just play, as the word implies. You can certainly call your sub a 'bad girl/boy' but you aren't actually upset with them.

If you plan to degrade or hurt your submissive, you need to be aware of just how much physical/mental pain you might cause. You cannot just lash out and see what happens. That can wrong really easy. Causing pain is an art and while some submissives can take a lot of punishment, even then you need to consider how hard you are striking and where. Human bodies are frail and a blow that hits a wrong spot can cause unwanted harm. That said, both dominant and submissive should be aware that if the play involves such elements, accidents might happen. Both parties need to be aware of the risks involved. Needless to say, communication is really important here.

I spent once a fifteen minutes or so biting my sub's neck, resulting her not feeling her jaw for a week. Oopsie. She did adore the bruising, though.

Regulating expectations
You cannot expect submissive to dive into the deep end with you, at least not at first. Similarly, you cannot expect your submissive strictly exist to serve only you. Submissives are people and have lives outside roleplay/fucking around. There are D/s agreements where submissive allows their dominant to take full control of their lives, but such arrangements are rare and often come with risks. Maybe I'll write about Total Power Exchange later. Either way, a good dominant should know what they can reasonably expect from a new partner. I don't think that the submissive people I know were asking anyone to read minds. I think that they merely wanted the dominant to take their time. Submitting to someone, particularly in real life, comes with substantial risks, something the dominant person should acknowledge.

Pushing edges
A dominant should not expect to be able to push their submissive to do something they don't want to do. Now, I have had some of the people above do something they didn't strictly want to do with their consent. This, however, did not happen until after we knew each other pretty well. This sort of play is often known as 'edge play' — as in, playing at the edge of your comfort zone. Needless to say, edge play shouldn't be attempted lightly, but it can be rewarding for both if done with enough caution. One still should not assume it is going to happen. Not every submissive wants to explore their limits and that does not make them any worse. A submissive should be able to expect their limits being respected.

Dominant that violates your limits or tries to push too hard (admittedly subjective experience) is a red flag. Just to spell that out. A submissive should be allowed their limits. It should be also their choices which limits get pushed, if any.

Accepting your submissive as they are
avfzLrI.png
This sorta ties with 'regulating your expectations'. Each and every sub is ultimately an individual and while some commonalities exist, you shouldn't be expect that every new sub you meet wants to do any of what you did with your previous sub. All people, subs included, want to be faced and treated as individuals — not as a porn dispensers. Even if some subs actually genuinely enjoy being 'used', how they want to be used can very a lot from sub to sub. As much as you are talking to a 'submissive', you should talk or treat them differently from other people — unless you are given a consent to do so. Calling someone a whore or a slut without strict consent is not something any dominant should do.

This means that a good dominant will take time to learn the preferences of their submissive/plaything and approach them as a fellow human instead of a a set of genitals. This applies to 'one night stands' and longer relationships both. This incidentally applies to roleplay as well. While a dom might be looking for a submissive write with, they shouldn't assume that the person on the other side of the screen wants to submit in-person. As it happens, most submissive people are usually pretty happy to entertain dom's requests as long as it's something they are comfortable doing. I have had pretty good luck asking my subby partners here something like 'Hey, could we include X in the scene'.

Knowledge
E2S1gYm.png
I think that knowledge comes in play two ways. First there's the so called 'mechanical competence'. Understanding what you can and can't do with your toys and how much pain/discomfort a given toy might cause. This ranges from understanding the melting points of different candles (don't use stearin candles for wax play) to understanding how to tie someone in such a way that you don't block the flow of blood to their extremities. If and if you are doing breath play (that is, suffocating/strangling your partner), you should also understand the dangers involved with each given method. As sexy as candle wax, ropes and strangling might seem, they all carry a real risk of long term harm which the dom has to understand intimately. This sort of experience can't be gained without having someone to mentor you or having a book at hand. I would recommend all prospective doms to experiment with themselves. Want to know how badly wax burns? Pour some on yourself. Want to know how a flogger feels on a thigh? Hit yourself a couple of times. A good dom knows or has a really good idea on just how much a given thing will hurt their sub.
 
Last edited:
Sadism

This post takes a look at the 'S' in BDSM - sadism. Being boring kitty that I am, I am going to start with the dictionary definition and then expand on it. According to Merriam-Webster, sadist is a person who takes pleasure in inflicting pain, punishment, or humiliation on others. This definition is perfectly workable (albeit bit inadequate) and it notably brings up how sadists tend to enjoy both the agony (physical pain) and fear (mental pain) of their playmate/victim.

A sadist doesn't only enjoy other's pain as commonly portrayed in the media. They also almost always take delight in seeing others cower in fear or shy away in disgust. There is sadistical slant in telling a group of dog lovers how one has eaten dog meat in China. Making others (really) uncomfortable on a purpose is a sadistic act. Some sadists either miss or chose to ignore this tidbit. Consequently, a lot of sadists are or come off as pricks.


Classification... sorta

iJiI6kL.png
Sadists are not all the same and yet everyone gets grouped under one banner. Which sorta makes sense, but doesn't quite capture the whole spectrum of sadism people portray. Anna, who loves to see her husband squirm when she spanks him is quite different from a serial killer that tortures his victims for sexual pleasure. Whit that distinction in mine, I am going to establish a rough framework to discussing different degrees (kinds) of sadism. This is by no means perfect division, but at least it is a division. It should offer some rudimentary definitions that are helpful when we discuss the extent of sadism and the different forms it can take.

Sadists of the first kind enjoy and prefer simulated or mild suffering with a consenting sexual partner. These people are turned off by the idea of coercion, but like pain and perhaps love to see their partner flustered. These people don't want to have anything to do with non-con nor do they want to write or read a rape scene. I would argue that the vast majority of sadists on the forum are strictly sadists of the first kind — we are talking people who want to play and write characters that hurt/tease/degrade other characters with the character's consent. Spanking someone while calling them a slut is by definition a sadistic act, as long as the person doing the spanking get aroused by their partner's reaction.

Sadists of the second kind enjoy and prefer their victim/plaything to suffer against their will. Sadist of the second kind would get turned on by watching a rape or torture take place. They would also get aroused if they took part to such an act, either in fiction or in real life. Chances are that they understand that what they yearn and desire is amoral, yet their brain doesn't strictly care. Sadists of the second kind are the folks seeking to write non-con scenes with their partner's consent. They understand and accept the dark part of they psyche and seek to feed the beast that dwells within.

XhOjRHW.jpeg
Sadists of the third kind want and need their victim/plaything to suffer against their will. In addition, they need more than just porn or 'roleplay'. These people want and need to force their will upon others. They care little about their partners, their victim's discomfort and misery merely feeding their urges. These are the sadists that generally end up getting banned on a writing site for obvious reasons. Should such a person act out their urges in real life, they likely end in prison. These people might or might not understand that their actions are amoral — those who understand are simply unable to resist their urges. Ramsey Bolton is a good example of criminally sexual sadist. He doesn't only hurt his playthings. He also makes sure that they are all terrified of him, playing with their emotions.

Some sadists of the third kind assume that their victims deserve their attention. This might overlap with psychopathy, but I am not saying that every psychopath is a sadist. I'll note that sadistic and intelligent psychopaths are far more rare than media would let us believe. If being psychopath got you far ahead in life, more psychopaths would have kids/family and thus pass on their genes. As it turns out, only 1% or so of people are actual psychopaths.

Lines drawn in water

Obviously what I described above is very much a series of lines drawn in water. As for me, I suppose I consider myself a sadist of the second kind. While these days I am content writing non-con, as a young man I had a bad habit trying to force my will on others. I've kissed someone against their will, I have bullied others and I have most certainly told people more than they want to know just to see them get flustered. In short, young Tassu was bit of a prick. It took me a while to understand that I need consent to 'play' with others. That I simply can't have my fun without considering what others might think.

Now, you might argue that it's perfectly fine to make others uncomfortable, but I disagree. If you are making others uncomfortable because it makes you feel good, you are probably a prick. While we all sometimes accidentally upset others, there's no moral justification for playing with others for your own enjoyment. If you are given consent to mess/tease someone, it's of course a different story. But if you enjoy fucking with people, you probably shouldn't assume that everyone wants you to fuck with them.


Healthy sadism


r6slMDo.png
It's perfectly possible to fulfill (most) sadistic urges in a consenting relationship. If the sadist negotiates the scene with their submissive/masochist play partner and stops hurting them the very moment they out the safe word we are talking sadism of the first degree that is perfectly acceptable. While there are always dangers involved sadomasochistic play, there is nothing inherently wrong with such play, as long as both parties are aware of the risks involved.

It's also possible to arrange a 'play rape' with your partner - a scene where the submissive pretends to resist the sadist. This sort of play is usually called consenting non-con. As much as this is flirting with sadism of second kind, I would still classify it as ~ sadism of first kind. The 'victim' is consenting after all. The coercion is merely an illusion. A safe word still ends the scene.


Communication
Communication is crucial. People who practice BDSM or write kinky do so at different comfort levels. Having a conversation with your partner(s) about their desires and limits leaves little room for harm and makes sure everyone is enjoying the activity. Keeping the conversation ongoing is essential as people's needs and wants can change. This is true for both real life relationships as well as roleplay. People who prefer the submissive role should remember that the dominant likely needs occasional reassurances that whatever is happening in the bedroom/in the story is both welcome and appreciated. It is somewhat hard to hurt someone (or step into a mind of a callous character) time after time without getting occasional reminder that your efforts are cherishes.

Roleplay
If you are a budding masochist and you know that you enjoy having your character hurt, you want to engage with a sadist of the first kind or a sadist of the second kind. I am probably pointing out the obvious, but you should know if you want the consent in the scene or not. That is, if you want your character to enjoy the pain or if you want them to suffer against their will. If you want the situation to be murky (a.k.a dub-con) you should be able explain to your writing partner how you want/expect the dynamic work out. There are several ways to set up a dub-con scenario and different people conceptualise dub-con differently. I'll maybe write a tidbit about dub-con at some later time — I think the topic warrants some discussion.
 
Origin of power

qT7sIBA.png
Who holds the power?
At least on paper, the dominant holds power over the submissive as they play. In reality, the situation is more convoluted. Many say that the true power lies with the submissive because they can always use a safeword and stop the scene. If D/s dynamics are formulated in this fashion, the dominant can be seen playing with the submissive with their consent. I do believe that this framing is fundamentally correct. However, it fails to take into account a few nuances that color some (if not all) D/s relationships. I want to emphasize that the dominant does not have legitimate power over the submissive without his or her consent. With consent removed, D/s becomes rape or sexual assault.



Tripping balls
A submissive can lose themselves in the subspace so utterly, that they cease to be able to talk. Usually, this happens with pain play, but I have seen it take place in DD/lg scenes as well. The submissive is so utterly overwhelmed by his or her sensations that they simply cannot vocalize their needs. They might try to avoid the flogger/cane/hands and growl in an animalistic fashion or they might lay there catatonic, hyperventilating as they whimper in pain. I've seen both things happen in real life with the subs that I have been hurting. Needless to say, in this situation the power no longer lies with the poor submissive, as they cannot make their will known. Of course, you could argue that no sub should be ever pushed so far that they lose the ability to talk, but as it turns out, they rather like the sensation. This has to do more with RL play than roleplay, but I have had experienced subs write their characters non-vocal. In this situation the dominant person has all the responsibility and thus all the power. One should figure out what to do in such a situation before one ends up there. Jay Wiseman has written about this and his book remains a classic.

Legitimate source of power
There are fundamentally two ways to take power. One can force themselves on a person and demand subservience or one can treat the submissive in such a manner that they crave to submit to you. While there are people who want to be physically overpowered and taken 'as if they were raped', most subs I have talked to highly prefer being treated like a human being. They wish to 'gift' their submission rather than having it forced. This should not surprise anyone. However, what makes a given person submit to a given dom depends a lot on the submissive and the chemistry between the two.

So you might wonder, what makes a submissive want to give power to someone. What makes a person worth submission? We have discussed why a submissive might do what they do earlier. But we haven't discussed the perquisites for this in much detail. Unsurprisingly, it boils down to trust. The submissive must trust the dominant to hand them the proverbial leash. Submissive must be able to trust that the dominant has their best interest in their mind. That the dominant won't abuse them.

Moth said:
I think it's important that the Dom(s) you choose to submit have a like-minded view of D/s and are seeking compatible things to you.

Moth here points out something important. The dominant and the submissive should agree on how D/s relations are formulated and that they are seeking compatible things. A submissive person cannot have this if they do not know how they frame D/s relationships and do not know what they want. Meanwhile the dominant needs to be able to communicate their needs and their D/s framework honestly and concisely. Good communication helps to build trust. Without trust, there is no willing submission. Thus the power the dominant holds is always based on and drawn from trust. There is only one way to build trust — honest and concise communication. Thus anyone striving to become a better dominant should hone their ability to communicate their wants and their understanding of D/s relations. A submissive won't want to play with a dom who wants to play with anyone. A submissive wants to play with someone who wants to play with them and whom they can trust utterly.

It should be noted that the dominant also holds the power to end the scene. In that sense, the submissive does not hold all the power. If the dominant cannot trust the sub or if they start to feel ill or sick, they are allowed to stop playing. This is well within their power. A dominant that stops play, because they are not certain that their sub is safe, is not weak. They are doing what they should. Dominant should be able to feel safe and comfortable. If the sub is tripping balls or untalkative, the dominant is allowed to use the safeword and stop the play.

This blogpost would have not been possible without the help of a few subs I know. Some of them are here, some of them are not. I appreciate their contribution nonetheless.
 
Last edited:
Shifting needs

7xUZTD9.png
While most sane people are aware that the needs of a given submissive might change over time, it's also good to be mindful that such shifts can also happen in a relatively short time span. BDSM is always about the exchange of energy. Dominant brings their energies to the scene (or story) and pours themselves on the submissive one way or another. The dominant has to pace the scene (or story) according to the sub's needs and capabilities. The dominant needs to push, but do not push too hard. They must bring themselves and their desires into the scene while remaining aware of any limitations their submissive might have.

The submissive, for their part, must yield and accommodate the needs of another. They must turn inward, observe themselves, and let their dominant know how they are feeling. They must be eager to serve and please their partner. As much as submissive folks yearn to let go, it takes some amount of energy and effort to push one's needs aside. If both parties do their due diligence, the scene remains playful in such a way that both parties find it both mentally and physically satisfying.

The meme on the left is perhaps meant to indicate that submissive people have often very different needs and urges. I've played with both little and brats and while those two have some commonalities, most littles don't really want to be treated like a brat and vice versa. A masochist would likely get nothing out of being treated like a brat or little. The meme also incidentally points out that the limits of the play shift as the energy levels of the players wax and wane. A submissive who has had a day off can push themselves far further than a sub who has worked a 12-hour shift earlier that day. A person who usually wants to be pent like a pretzel and fucked until they forget their name might want to play lighter when they are stressed and tired. There's absolutely nothing wrong with this. A good submissive can recognize their internal energy levels and communicate those. A good dominant can often read the submissive, assuming that they know them well. That said, reading a person is far more difficult and submissive folks shouldn't expect doms to be able to have a perfect read of their energy levels.
 
On risks and mishaps

This particular tidbit is more about BDSM in real life than BDSM depicted in roleplay. In roleplay, there are no mishaps or accidents. Every scene is as sexy as the writers want it to be. In real life, things happen. Now, admittedly things can go wrong with vanilla sex as well. The condom might break or someone might get a nasty cramp. I have even heard of a woman who dislocated her hip while riding her partner. When you add impact play, pain, and bondage to the mix, you get far more things that can go 'wrong'. In some ways, BDSM is 'more risky' than regular sex, despite what most people into D/s would want to admit. That said, the BDSM communities across the world have come up with some tools and guidelines to regulate play.

Safe, Sane and Consensual (SSC)
Safe, sane and consensual is the oldest formulation for safe D/s play. It emphasizes that both parties should feel safe when engaging in a kink activity together. This notably includes the dominant as well, meaning that a submissive should not be able to push/persuade the dominant to do something they do not feel comfortable with. Sane refers to both parties being responsible for agreeing on what they consider sane. This will vary from couple to couple, but there should be a shared understanding of what sort of play is 'sane'. Lastly, the play should be consensual. I don't think I need to explain why this is necessary. Without consent, there is no play. Play without explicit consent is rape.

I don't particularly like SSC. I don't think there's anything wrong with it as per se. I personally think that it obfuscates some of the risks inherent to BDSM under the 'sane'. A lot of things that people might deem 'sane' could still have dangers involved with them.

I once had an online partner ream herself with a dildo as hard as she could, only for her to tell me that she had to stop because she was bleeding. Generally speaking, assuming enough warm-up, having someone fuck themselves silly with a dildo should be safe. Chances are that hundreds of thousands or even millions of women fuck themselves silly every day. And yet, there have been a few incidents when I've had to stop or adjust a scene because my toy obeyed my orders to the letter and managed to ream themselves so thoroughly that they broke something within. To give another example, I was once biting my partner's neck. I wasn't particularly rough nor was she in much pain, at least for her. And yet I managed to nick something and the poor girl could not feel the left side of her jaw for a week. She didn't even notice this until after we had showered and were having dinner.

The people involved in the examples above never suffered any long-term harm. The scene/play seemed inherently safe. The scene/play was sane all things considered and still, things went wrong. Not catastrophically, but still. Pain/impact play always carries a risk of injury and both parties should be aware of this. Which brings us to the formulation I prefer myself.

Risk-Aware Consensual Kink (RACK)
The consensual part is probably obvious, but the 'risk-aware' warrants some exploration. It refers to both partners being equally aware of the potential risks involved. Usually, it falls on the more experienced person to inform the less experienced person of what might go wrong and what should happen if things go wrong. This can be as simple as agreeing to stop if the submissive starts to cry while getting spanked or agreeing that bruises might happen and that both parties are fine with it. This might also include agreeing that a particularly large toy might get stuck and if that happens, the play will stop until the problem has been resolved. In some ways, the idea is to cover the potential risks before the play, so that both parties know what to do if something goes awry.

I've had a few online partners poke their nipples and clits with needles. I ask them to disinfect the needles with rubbing alcohol and to prepare rubbing alcohol for the wounds to make sure that no infections take place. I still note that, even with all the precautions, a small infection might happen. I once had a mishap with a sub trying to poke a needle into her nipple, only for her to push a little too hard, and she almost pierced her nipple. I hadn't quite considered that risk and we stopped that part of the play there. Neither of us felt safe to push further. Needless to say, needles are inherently more risky than dildos. The same can be said of candle wax. I've had a partner get wax stuck on her pubic hair and spend 20 minutes trying to pluck it off. In hindsight, we should have realized that it could happen. Now I know. I think that it's better to acknowledge and admit the risks rather than to insist that everything is safe and sane. When you are hurting someone, or asking them to hurt themselves, you are always taking a risk.

This is just to emphasize the fact that, even if you try to plan things and take everything into account, mishaps can and will happen. You cannot be 100% safe as mistakes may happen. That's not the end of the world. All the subs I've made mistakes with have happily continued playing with me. Dominants don't need to get everything right the first time or be perfect. They merely need to act accordingly and own their mistakes.
 
Back
Top Bottom