Xanaphia
Biblically Accurate Bitch
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2013
Since I have decided to publish my first novel, one question has haunted me: can I really consider myself a serious author if I don’t pontificate upon the act of writing? Clearly not, so I bring you, good writers of BMR, my own curated list of writing tips. Because, as it turns out, writing about writing is a delightfully meta way of procrastinating from actually finishing my novel.
Now, I am certainly no expert. Clearly, I can barely differentiate between form and from*, so feel to disregard my advice as it suits you.
First things first. There is only one hard and fast rule when it comes to writing: Anything is allowed, so long as it works.
Now, does this mean that everything works in writing? Nope! How can a writer know if a technique worked? Well, this is subjective, but the best metric is whether or not the meaning is conveyed. If readers aren't coming to the meaning the author intended, then the technique didn't work.
The sad truth is well written and engaging are not always one and the same. Some critically celebrated novels have incorrect grammar (Cormac McCarthy's No Country for Old Men, James Joyce's Ulysses, William Faulkner's Sound and Fury). Some extremely popular novels are beloved by fans, even though they have technical and structural errors in the narrative.
Once you understand how and why the rules work, you can use them to your advantage, to craft the story that is buzzing around your head. And you can even learn when to break them.
Everything in this thread should be taken as suggestion. There is no one right way to write. If you are willing to listen to advice and experiment with new techniques, you will grow as a writer.
I welcome any questions and comments in this thread, as well as suggestions for future topics.
*I honestly do know the difference, but my fingers are quite fond of typing form when I mean from, so it might seem to some that I don't.
Now, I am certainly no expert. Clearly, I can barely differentiate between form and from*, so feel to disregard my advice as it suits you.
First things first. There is only one hard and fast rule when it comes to writing: Anything is allowed, so long as it works.
Now, does this mean that everything works in writing? Nope! How can a writer know if a technique worked? Well, this is subjective, but the best metric is whether or not the meaning is conveyed. If readers aren't coming to the meaning the author intended, then the technique didn't work.
The sad truth is well written and engaging are not always one and the same. Some critically celebrated novels have incorrect grammar (Cormac McCarthy's No Country for Old Men, James Joyce's Ulysses, William Faulkner's Sound and Fury). Some extremely popular novels are beloved by fans, even though they have technical and structural errors in the narrative.
Once you understand how and why the rules work, you can use them to your advantage, to craft the story that is buzzing around your head. And you can even learn when to break them.
Everything in this thread should be taken as suggestion. There is no one right way to write. If you are willing to listen to advice and experiment with new techniques, you will grow as a writer.
I welcome any questions and comments in this thread, as well as suggestions for future topics.
*I honestly do know the difference, but my fingers are quite fond of typing form when I mean from, so it might seem to some that I don't.
Last edited: