☢☢Zombies Galore☢☢
Supernova
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2009
So the Belgian police raided the offices of the Vatican's sex abuse commission and bishops are all up in a tizzy.
My thought is that it wasn't really the Vatican's place to be investigating its own people in what is clearly a criminal matter. That abusing children is a criminal matter is pretty cut and dry to me. I get lost right around the time someone decides it's not a conflict of interest for the Vatican to be investigating child abuse by its employees instead of handing it over to civil authorities. Not only that, but I think it's the same thing as vigilante justice if the Vatican is allowed to investigate claims of abuse in place of legally sanctioned authorities. I can definitely see a place for priests, nuns, associated holy people to help legally sanctioned investigators.
Should the Vatican be allowed to investigate their own people? Were the Belgian police wrong to raid those offices? Does it make any sense that Vatican closed down their sex abuse inquiry over the situation?
My thought is that it wasn't really the Vatican's place to be investigating its own people in what is clearly a criminal matter. That abusing children is a criminal matter is pretty cut and dry to me. I get lost right around the time someone decides it's not a conflict of interest for the Vatican to be investigating child abuse by its employees instead of handing it over to civil authorities. Not only that, but I think it's the same thing as vigilante justice if the Vatican is allowed to investigate claims of abuse in place of legally sanctioned authorities. I can definitely see a place for priests, nuns, associated holy people to help legally sanctioned investigators.
Should the Vatican be allowed to investigate their own people? Were the Belgian police wrong to raid those offices? Does it make any sense that Vatican closed down their sex abuse inquiry over the situation?