PsionicCuttlefish
Supernova
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2012
Since no one else did, I thought this was a good discussion to continue from this Questions thread. Personally (preface emphasis on personally), I prefer threads over PMs for several reasons;
1) Easier to keep track of: The only -possible- way to be able to keep track of multiple simultaneous PM RPs is to sort them all into Folders, but even then, keeping track can still be a challenge; you have to click on each and every folder that you -suspect- has had any activity recently to check and see if you need to reply there, and that gets a bit annoying. With the Subscribed Threads feature, this is a total nonissue with threads.
2) Easier to re-read later: With threads, everything is presented in nice, neat, linear, post-by-post, page-by-page fashion. Simple, easy. As you reply back and forth to a PM chain, nested quotes stack up more and more. Not only does this get uglier and more unreadable over time, but once a PM starts getting big enough, it lags browsers when you try to write into it. I learned this almost immediately after joining this site, and since then, I have made it an automatic habit to always truncate nest-quotes, and only allow PMs I send to have a single quote of the message I am replying to. When re-reading PM RPs, this means I have to click on every other PM in the folder, opening them all in their own tabs, and then read them one at a time. That too, gets annoying.
I also wanted to build off to two posts I saw in the linked Questions thread:
I get replies to four different RPs in this order: A, B, C, and D.
However, all that said, if I made it my strict policy that I do not RP in PMs, I would have missed out on some truly amazing RPs with amazing partners, who themselves had a strict rule of only-PMs. If I get a partner who has that strict rule, I will bend; otherwise, I will push for threads. Also, even though it is "hidden", PM RPs are treated no differently than thread-RPs in terms of my reply-queue.
So. How about the rest of you, BMR? Your opinions, preferences, and habits?
(*There are only two not-presently-active thread-RPs in all of my posting history where I am not the last poster, both are extenuating circumstances and not "ditched" as such. In one, after my partner replied, I sent an OOC PM asking if they might be able to edit a few things before I made a post, but said partner happened to vanish off the face of BlueMoon around that same time. The other, partner and I decided out-of-thread to just let that one go.)
1) Easier to keep track of: The only -possible- way to be able to keep track of multiple simultaneous PM RPs is to sort them all into Folders, but even then, keeping track can still be a challenge; you have to click on each and every folder that you -suspect- has had any activity recently to check and see if you need to reply there, and that gets a bit annoying. With the Subscribed Threads feature, this is a total nonissue with threads.
2) Easier to re-read later: With threads, everything is presented in nice, neat, linear, post-by-post, page-by-page fashion. Simple, easy. As you reply back and forth to a PM chain, nested quotes stack up more and more. Not only does this get uglier and more unreadable over time, but once a PM starts getting big enough, it lags browsers when you try to write into it. I learned this almost immediately after joining this site, and since then, I have made it an automatic habit to always truncate nest-quotes, and only allow PMs I send to have a single quote of the message I am replying to. When re-reading PM RPs, this means I have to click on every other PM in the folder, opening them all in their own tabs, and then read them one at a time. That too, gets annoying.
I also wanted to build off to two posts I saw in the linked Questions thread:
For me it's the fact i am usually behind in a RP with someone. Posting in a thread lets everyone know i just posted and some people have expressed great displeasure at my posting to a thread before responding to their RP first. Sometimes my muse simply isnt with a given RP, but ive been accused of so much based simply on slow responses to a RP...
If I keep them all to PM usually that doesn't happen.
I settled on a system to neatly avoid this problem, myself; I keep a -strict- queue of RP reply-order, in that I -always- reply to RPs in the order of whichever has been waiting the longest. To demonstrate:Ah, I do know what its like to be "thread stalked". It is very unpleasant[...]But for the most part I started letting those people know if they were going to bother me over posting order they can drop the RP with me because I refuse to be stressed about an activity thats supposed to be fun and enjoyable.
I get replies to four different RPs in this order: A, B, C, and D.
- I reply to A. I reply to B. I reply to C.
- I get a reply to B.
- I reply to D.
- I get a reply to D. I get a reply to A.
- I reply to B. I reply to D.
- I get a reply to D.
- I reply to A. I reply to D.
However, all that said, if I made it my strict policy that I do not RP in PMs, I would have missed out on some truly amazing RPs with amazing partners, who themselves had a strict rule of only-PMs. If I get a partner who has that strict rule, I will bend; otherwise, I will push for threads. Also, even though it is "hidden", PM RPs are treated no differently than thread-RPs in terms of my reply-queue.
So. How about the rest of you, BMR? Your opinions, preferences, and habits?
(*There are only two not-presently-active thread-RPs in all of my posting history where I am not the last poster, both are extenuating circumstances and not "ditched" as such. In one, after my partner replied, I sent an OOC PM asking if they might be able to edit a few things before I made a post, but said partner happened to vanish off the face of BlueMoon around that same time. The other, partner and I decided out-of-thread to just let that one go.)