Questions: respond only with questions

[Silver117]

Does anyone have the answer?

 

[Lydia]

Isn’t “no answer” basically an answer, though?

 

[Prose]

Why do you need an answer?

 

[Anonyman]

In the wise words of The Violator played by John Leguizamo: "why ask 'why', when 'how' is so much more fun?"

 

[Aviatrix]

What does that have to do with the question?

 

[lowblow emma]

How do we know what that has to do with the question when we haven't established what that question is?

 

[Anonyman]

Good point, but do we even want to rediscover the question now?

 

[Aviatrix]

What other questions did we have to address?

 

[CougarGirl]

Can anyone remember?

 

[lowblow emma]

Why don't we just start over with a new question?

 

[Anonyman]

I concur, but what would be the best option for a new question?

 

[Sync]

I'd say any question that gives us a new track would do, wouldn't it?

 

[Lydia]

Do you guys realize how meta this has become?

 

[Sync]

Probably, but isn't that half the fun?

 

[Xanax]

No, aren't we supposed to be "telling stories" or something?

 

[Lydia]

Omg, is that what this site is for?

 

[Aviatrix]

Isn't the purpose meant to be determined by the members writing together?

 

[Sync]

If we're all writing with consent and we're all having fun, what does it matter?

 

[lowblow emma]

For me, as an occasional contributor, the most important question is: can I be bothered?

 

[ImpureInclinations]

But if you’re not (hot and) bothered, then Is your role play really worth doing?

 

[Xanax]

Wouldn't that depend on the individual's reason for writing?

 

[Razgriz]

What if they wrote for the sake of writing?

 

[Aviatrix]

Would it matter what their reasons are?

 

[lowblow emma]

So should I bother writing any more?

 

[Sync]

Sure, why wouldn't you?