Non-Con Desires
Planetoid
- Joined
- May 10, 2014
Ironic! I just remembered that I have not messaged you!
*Starts scribbling*
*Starts scribbling*
Ironic said:My boyfriend knows well what I do on here.
I even give him the privilege to snoop around my inbox and threads.
He is happy that I am enjoying myself, since he does not fancy writing himself.
But, then again, that is my relationship.
Raze said:I actually tried to get one of my old girlfriends to RP with me. She was big on D&D so I introduced her to freeform RPing, and suggested doing one with her.
It ended up crashing and burning because she got intimidated a couple posts in, but it was cute watching her lurk around from time to time.
littl3 said:Pfft no. Oral isn't cheating either... Giving or receiving.
Rudolph Quin said:Oh, also, because I thought I'd already offered an opinion on this thread: If you can't/wouldn't do it with the s/o sitting next to you, it's cheating.
Krimson said:Rudolph Quin said:Oh, also, because I thought I'd already offered an opinion on this thread: If you can't/wouldn't do it with the s/o sitting next to you, it's cheating.
I agree with almost everything said in this thread except for this.
There is a significant distinction between "can't" and "wouldn't."
In addition, "wouldn't" could be due to a variety of reasons.
There's "wouldn't" because one knows one's s/o doesn't approve, then there's "wouldn't" for the same reason one might not blatantly start streaming porn with their s/o sitting next to them. Just because one's s/o doesn't mind one watching porn doesn't mean they are ok with one doing it next to him/her?
Rudolph Quin said:Krimson said:Rudolph Quin said:Oh, also, because I thought I'd already offered an opinion on this thread: If you can't/wouldn't do it with the s/o sitting next to you, it's cheating.
I agree with almost everything said in this thread except for this.
There is a significant distinction between "can't" and "wouldn't."
In addition, "wouldn't" could be due to a variety of reasons.
There's "wouldn't" because one knows one's s/o doesn't approve, then there's "wouldn't" for the same reason one might not blatantly start streaming porn with their s/o sitting next to them. Just because one's s/o doesn't mind one watching porn doesn't mean they are ok with one doing it next to him/her?
Very cute since the only other comment I made in the thread was a joke drum noise. The implication is "approval" since it went over your head. If your s/I would be hurt or disapprove then it is something to be discussed and boundaries respected. Please don't quibble over literal details. This is about what most would consider a relationship and companionship that goes beyond nonjudgemental friends and is based on a sense of loyalty and trust. If the s/o knew about it and wouldn't approve that is a good guideline to take as whether it is crossing them or not, since that is the defining characteristic of "cheating". If they wouldn't care or you're not committed then the question is moot.
Krimson said:Even on the point of s/o, there is a difference between "disapprove" and "consider it cheating." Some girls (or guys) might dislike it if their s/o watched porn, but they don't consider it cheating. The same distinction can be drawn about erotic roleplay.
Krimson said:But I do find it interesting that your first reaction is passive aggressiveness when I merely intended to state my opinion and to seek to clarify something that struck me as being a distinction. Is an ad hominem attack really necessary when I merely wanted to contribute to the discussion? But, if my opinion is of such nonintellectual variety as to be mere "quibble", then I will, for the sake of not stepping on anyone's toes, cease my attempt at a peaceful dialogue.
Krimson said:Is an ad hominem attack really necessary when I merely wanted to contribute to the discussion?