Zombies Galore said:
How would that experience be demonstrated? I could easily say I was a mod on a forum of a now unregistered domain, there'd be no accountability or checking. Beyond that, how would one reliably prove one had done a reasonably effective job in that position?
Is there a litmus test?
I don't really have a test for moderators. It's a combination of 'will you abuse your position' and 'will you use your position'. Those are both very hard qualities to judge from past experience, in particular because some people will lose interest in a site for any number of reasons, even if they remain active elsewhere.
I can pull some activity metrics of people though, checking, for example, how many days they made a post in, and making a judgment about that. But that's entirely internal to this site.
'Will you abuse your position' is why applicants are going to be put through a bit of a grinder. It's not just a matter of pruning people that get a lot of complaints, but also just setting some ground rules of entrance. "You agree not to abuse your position." I have booted people for this, and this thread is not the first such incident across the sites under my control. Making people aware of that helps. Not just in letting the membership know that they can talk to me about incidents, but also in the mod team knowing that yes, there is a guy up there with an axe.
<rant>
For people who claim to program, I usually just ask some dinky one-line of code question. If they are lying about their ability, they give me various bullshit about how I should cut them some slack (for a single line of code), rather than admit that they lied to me and do not in fact know jack fucking shit.
</rant>
I'd probably ask something similar of people who say they know css.