Star Pupil
Old soul
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
- Location
- Valhalla
For a long time I considered the length of my post to equate to that of my literacy skill. I thought and often times still think, if I don't write a certain amount of paragraphs my partner will get bored of me. Or they'll think I'm bored with them!
But with the obsession of being able to write more and more...at what point does it stop being roleplaying and more that you're telling a story? Or more often than not, a retro active story?
Retro-posting is annoying to me now. It used to never bother me, but now it does because I want to be able to *react* to something. My reaction to something could potentially change the way the next action that my partner will take, but if I don't get a chance because I'm far too busy retro reacting and then acting later, it leaves a lacking feeling. Well geeze, I could have done this but the story is already moved on and I can't do anything but retro act now.
But wait! You can write a very lengthy, descriptive post without actually doing something. But then, there's that thing we like to call fluff. To have that be a requirement every single post seems silly. We've already set the scene and described everything around us. We do not need to revisit the crack in the wall, or the peculiar stench in the air we noted at the beginning that is getting no better but no worse, etc.
Anyways I'm rambling. Back to the current topic. The definition of literacy is this:
lit·er·a·cy
ˈlidərəsē,ˈlitrəsē/
noun
the ability to read and write.
synonyms: ability to read and write, reading/writing proficiency; More
competence or knowledge in a specified area.
"wine literacy can't be taught in three hours"
If a partner has both the ability to write and the knowledge to create a visual of the setting around you for the most part, but only averaged a paragraph, would you consider that person literate?
But with the obsession of being able to write more and more...at what point does it stop being roleplaying and more that you're telling a story? Or more often than not, a retro active story?
Retro-posting is annoying to me now. It used to never bother me, but now it does because I want to be able to *react* to something. My reaction to something could potentially change the way the next action that my partner will take, but if I don't get a chance because I'm far too busy retro reacting and then acting later, it leaves a lacking feeling. Well geeze, I could have done this but the story is already moved on and I can't do anything but retro act now.
But wait! You can write a very lengthy, descriptive post without actually doing something. But then, there's that thing we like to call fluff. To have that be a requirement every single post seems silly. We've already set the scene and described everything around us. We do not need to revisit the crack in the wall, or the peculiar stench in the air we noted at the beginning that is getting no better but no worse, etc.
Anyways I'm rambling. Back to the current topic. The definition of literacy is this:
lit·er·a·cy
ˈlidərəsē,ˈlitrəsē/
noun
the ability to read and write.
synonyms: ability to read and write, reading/writing proficiency; More
competence or knowledge in a specified area.
"wine literacy can't be taught in three hours"
If a partner has both the ability to write and the knowledge to create a visual of the setting around you for the most part, but only averaged a paragraph, would you consider that person literate?