Panoptipal
Moon
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
_
_______Closed.
_
_______Closed.
_
Your support makes Blue Moon possible (Patreon)
(Closed) Pathfinder horror
- Thread starter Panoptipal
- Start date
Panoptipal
Moon
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
RE: Spooky D&D - Hunting Monsters, Undead, Mad Science
_
_______Closed.
_
_
_______Closed.
_
Panoptipal
Moon
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
RE: Spooky D&D - Hunting Monsters, Undead, Mad Science
_
_______Example Interest Response
_
_
_
_
_______Example Interest Response
_
_
_
_______Hi. I'm Pano. I bloody love tabletop. I know 3.5 cause thats where my clerics kept dying and dying and dying in highschool. I know Pathfinder cause that's the one where my wizards were always kicking hectares of ugly monster butt. I prefer Pathfinder because it ain't so old and busted.
_______I would totally be on board with an adventure movie like Van Helsing, but more serious stuff like Sleepy Hollow or Shirley Jackson's The Haunting of Hill House is also cool.
_______I'm okay with most everything, so long as my character doesn't have to bone a zombie or get seduced by a same sex vampire. I can take or leave the porn.
_______And if dudes wanna play ladies, that's cool. Wouldn't tap that though. Girls playing dudes ... Maaaaaybe.
_______The character I wanna do is a robot, maybe a robot bounty hunter. My main concerns are whether we'll be able to use Eberron material and if I can have robot animal companions or something. He could be a monk. Or, if monks suck a lot, a ranger. And I also want to wear a hat.
http://wallpaperswa.com/thumbnails/detail/20120523/robots%20fantasy%20art%20artwork%20cape%201920x1080%20wallpaper_wallpaperswa.com_84.jpg
_
_
_
_______Hi. I'm Pano. I bloody love tabletop. I know 3.5 cause thats where my clerics kept dying and dying and dying in highschool. I know Pathfinder cause that's the one where my wizards were always kicking hectares of ugly monster butt. I prefer Pathfinder because it ain't so old and busted.
_______I would totally be on board with an adventure movie like Van Helsing, but more serious stuff like Sleepy Hollow or Shirley Jackson's The Haunting of Hill House is also cool.
_______I'm okay with most everything, so long as my character doesn't have to bone a zombie or get seduced by a same sex vampire. I can take or leave the porn.
_______And if dudes wanna play ladies, that's cool. Wouldn't tap that though. Girls playing dudes ... Maaaaaybe.
_______The character I wanna do is a robot, maybe a robot bounty hunter. My main concerns are whether we'll be able to use Eberron material and if I can have robot animal companions or something. He could be a monk. Or, if monks suck a lot, a ranger. And I also want to wear a hat.
http://wallpaperswa.com/thumbnails/detail/20120523/robots%20fantasy%20art%20artwork%20cape%201920x1080%20wallpaper_wallpaperswa.com_84.jpg
_
_
_
RE: D&D - Gothic Horror, Monsters, Adventure
Very cool concept, and hopefully something i can get into. Posting interest....................................................................................................................................now
Hi I'm Sirix. I do know both 3.5 but HIGHLY prefer Pathfinder, i just think its more user friendly.
I tend to be more into adventure plays, though im trying to expand and really be able to play anything, so whatever we do is ok with me.
Who plays what character doesn't bother me.
aaaaannnnnnddddd same as above, no sexy times with zombies, and ill just fight off any vampire coming after me so that would be fun for awkwardness.
While i would like to try a summoner i can understand why you would rather not allow it. While this is subject to change according to what the group ultimately wants to be the direction, He will be a Half-elf with a vendetta against undead (think ranger favored enemy) for killing his parents and destroying most of his village. He is here because he heard lead of a Necromancer in the area that may be able to lead him to the Necromancer that lead the attack on his village.
Very cool concept, and hopefully something i can get into. Posting interest....................................................................................................................................now
Hi I'm Sirix. I do know both 3.5 but HIGHLY prefer Pathfinder, i just think its more user friendly.
I tend to be more into adventure plays, though im trying to expand and really be able to play anything, so whatever we do is ok with me.
Who plays what character doesn't bother me.
aaaaannnnnnddddd same as above, no sexy times with zombies, and ill just fight off any vampire coming after me so that would be fun for awkwardness.
While i would like to try a summoner i can understand why you would rather not allow it. While this is subject to change according to what the group ultimately wants to be the direction, He will be a Half-elf with a vendetta against undead (think ranger favored enemy) for killing his parents and destroying most of his village. He is here because he heard lead of a Necromancer in the area that may be able to lead him to the Necromancer that lead the attack on his village.
Panoptipal
Moon
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
RE: D&D - Gothic Horror, Monsters, Adventure
No direct issue with Summoners. Most people have misconceptions about the rules relating to them. Other players may have concerns, mine are mostly going to be along the lines of characters being thematic and dramatic. Example, summoning machine parts into being that become your eidalon or spontaneously assembling biomass into creatures.
I think your concern should be whether you're going to be putting excessive amounts of time into the mechanics for an unspeaking combat drone. And since you're talking half-elf, I assume you're looking to do the favoured class option where they add to the eidolons skill evolution point pool, right?
Might have to rethink the Unspeaking part, eh?
PS
You are going to hate necromancers. They are sick monkeys. Interviewing them... *giggles* Oh boy, that'll be entertaining.
No direct issue with Summoners. Most people have misconceptions about the rules relating to them. Other players may have concerns, mine are mostly going to be along the lines of characters being thematic and dramatic. Example, summoning machine parts into being that become your eidalon or spontaneously assembling biomass into creatures.
I think your concern should be whether you're going to be putting excessive amounts of time into the mechanics for an unspeaking combat drone. And since you're talking half-elf, I assume you're looking to do the favoured class option where they add to the eidolons skill evolution point pool, right?
Might have to rethink the Unspeaking part, eh?
PS
You are going to hate necromancers. They are sick monkeys. Interviewing them... *giggles* Oh boy, that'll be entertaining.
Cherubian
Supernova
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2010
RE: D&D - Gothic Horror, Monsters, Adventure
*gently prods the dormant thread, waiting for a sign of life*
Hi. I'm Cherubian.
I like role playing, and I also like dice rolling. Been doing both for quite a while. And of course the sexy bits. Those are a more recent past time of mine.
Having it all in one package is even greater, which is why I am typing this.
Pathfinder and 3.5. both sound great, gut given the choice I'd go for pathfinder. It is just more consolidated, without ten dozen supplemental books spread all over the place. Stuff's easier to find on the web as well, all in one neat place. And they have the better Monk archetypes.
Yeah, I know it says 'Horror' in the title, but I personally would prefer if things weren't too angsty and traumatic. Hey, we are supposed to be heroes and not some wimps or wimpesses who get a severe mental trauma at the sight of the first zombie. A bit of humor won't hurt, either.
The one kink I have serious problems with is non consensual sex, including being mind controlled into the act. Or generally being the plaything of a more powerful partner. Kind of a reverse Red Sonja, if I can't beat it in a fight I don't want to fuck it either.
In regards to what I am paired up against, however, I am rather flexible. Including being boned by a zombie. Or would that be a skeleton then? Doesn't mix well with my aversion against non-con? Come on, be a bit creative, GM!
I couldn't care less what sort of biology the real life individual behind the online persona I am interacting with has.
The character I wanna play is a Monk. I just LOVE the thought of being completely(?) equipment independent, beating up the bad guys even while stark naked, so that is my nr 1 default, some sexy scantly clad monster huntress. Sadly the creators of the rules system did not like the class as much and gave it a severe case of multi-attribute-dependency. Stat points never seem to be enough. So I often try to coax the GM into some favorable house ruling.
*give the thread another nudge*
Got all of it?
*gently prods the dormant thread, waiting for a sign of life*
Hi. I'm Cherubian.
I like role playing, and I also like dice rolling. Been doing both for quite a while. And of course the sexy bits. Those are a more recent past time of mine.
Having it all in one package is even greater, which is why I am typing this. Pathfinder and 3.5. both sound great, gut given the choice I'd go for pathfinder. It is just more consolidated, without ten dozen supplemental books spread all over the place. Stuff's easier to find on the web as well, all in one neat place. And they have the better Monk archetypes.
Yeah, I know it says 'Horror' in the title, but I personally would prefer if things weren't too angsty and traumatic. Hey, we are supposed to be heroes and not some wimps or wimpesses who get a severe mental trauma at the sight of the first zombie. A bit of humor won't hurt, either.
The one kink I have serious problems with is non consensual sex, including being mind controlled into the act. Or generally being the plaything of a more powerful partner. Kind of a reverse Red Sonja, if I can't beat it in a fight I don't want to fuck it either.
In regards to what I am paired up against, however, I am rather flexible. Including being boned by a zombie. Or would that be a skeleton then? Doesn't mix well with my aversion against non-con? Come on, be a bit creative, GM!
I couldn't care less what sort of biology the real life individual behind the online persona I am interacting with has.
The character I wanna play is a Monk. I just LOVE the thought of being completely(?) equipment independent, beating up the bad guys even while stark naked, so that is my nr 1 default, some sexy scantly clad monster huntress. Sadly the creators of the rules system did not like the class as much and gave it a severe case of multi-attribute-dependency. Stat points never seem to be enough. So I often try to coax the GM into some favorable house ruling.
*give the thread another nudge*
Got all of it?
Panoptipal
Moon
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
RE: D&D - Gothic Horror, Monsters, Adventure
_
_______Apparently dormancy is way of system games around here. No fear though. I hover. And Sirix seems the type to lurk until the opportune moment.
_______Greetings Chez'Rubianne,
_______Genre: Yeah, my first thought was pulp, the Hugh Jackman in Van Helsing or the Brendan Fraser in The Mummy sort. So that's two for Action Over Angst. Two for Pathfinder as well.
_______Class: Yes, Monks are rather cool and have suffered unjustly. Feel free to suggest any house rules that cross your mind, especially if this ends up being a three person group.
_______I can think of nothing else. If either of you have suggestions about the ad I'll take em.
_
_
_______Apparently dormancy is way of system games around here. No fear though. I hover. And Sirix seems the type to lurk until the opportune moment.
_______Greetings Chez'Rubianne,
_______Genre: Yeah, my first thought was pulp, the Hugh Jackman in Van Helsing or the Brendan Fraser in The Mummy sort. So that's two for Action Over Angst. Two for Pathfinder as well.
_______Class: Yes, Monks are rather cool and have suffered unjustly. Feel free to suggest any house rules that cross your mind, especially if this ends up being a three person group.
_______I can think of nothing else. If either of you have suggestions about the ad I'll take em.
_
Kai
Star
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
RE: Pathfinder - Horror, Monsters, Adventure
Hey there, i just noticed this thread! I'm Godfang and i'd like to apply for this.
* Pathfinder all the way for me, it's simply a superior 3.5 (the only thing 3.5 has over it is a few more paragon paths and options)
*Gothic Romance+Pulp would be the combination of my choice (I just think that play by post is not ideal for extremely combat heavy campaigns, so adding some plot and intrigue would be good)
* I don't have many limits really, though i'm not into gore or vore (and definitely not scat). I enjoy sexy games though so i'd like it to be graphic.
* No problem at all, in fact, one of my character concept is a female.
* Mostly i play humans. I will either play an inquisitor who is out to inflict brutal torture on witches, or a sex-crazed female ninja (refluffed as a traditional assasin if there are no oriental culture in the setting), perhaps following Sirix's character around because she finds his quest for revenge amusing (and violence to be a turn on)
Hey there, i just noticed this thread! I'm Godfang and i'd like to apply for this.
* Pathfinder all the way for me, it's simply a superior 3.5 (the only thing 3.5 has over it is a few more paragon paths and options)
*Gothic Romance+Pulp would be the combination of my choice (I just think that play by post is not ideal for extremely combat heavy campaigns, so adding some plot and intrigue would be good)
* I don't have many limits really, though i'm not into gore or vore (and definitely not scat). I enjoy sexy games though so i'd like it to be graphic.
* No problem at all, in fact, one of my character concept is a female.
* Mostly i play humans. I will either play an inquisitor who is out to inflict brutal torture on witches, or a sex-crazed female ninja (refluffed as a traditional assasin if there are no oriental culture in the setting), perhaps following Sirix's character around because she finds his quest for revenge amusing (and violence to be a turn on)
RE: Pathfinder - Horror, Monsters, Adventure
Oh i plan on making him a speaking character if you will allow. I'm making a pair right now that i will probably just port and adjust to work with this campaign.
And yes, i do plan on doing the 1/4 favored class option.
Oh i plan on making him a speaking character if you will allow. I'm making a pair right now that i will probably just port and adjust to work with this campaign.
And yes, i do plan on doing the 1/4 favored class option.
Panoptipal
Moon
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
RE: Pathfinder - Horror, Monsters, Adventure
_
_______Hey Ho Godfang,
_______Looks like Pathfinder is consensus at this point. Nothing to add really. If there's a restriction on the setting it's that none of the party is "from" Ustalav aka Movie Transylvania. Golarion has eastern themed stuff, and a subset of china-humans (the Tian) but they never got a serious write-up that I'm aware of.
_______So Sirix will be a two-person-person. That'll be neat.
_______Cherubian asked me about adjusting the monk with a feat, so she could use wisdom for her melee to-hit and damage with unarmed. I suggested she expand it to improvised weapons. My reasoning for this is it's flavourful and a monk would be grabbing strength anyhow. Also it helps the party to have a bare-hands-buzz-saw leading the charge. Certainly it frees up the Eidolon a little.
_
_
_______Hey Ho Godfang,
_______Looks like Pathfinder is consensus at this point. Nothing to add really. If there's a restriction on the setting it's that none of the party is "from" Ustalav aka Movie Transylvania. Golarion has eastern themed stuff, and a subset of china-humans (the Tian) but they never got a serious write-up that I'm aware of.
_______So Sirix will be a two-person-person. That'll be neat.
_______Cherubian asked me about adjusting the monk with a feat, so she could use wisdom for her melee to-hit and damage with unarmed. I suggested she expand it to improvised weapons. My reasoning for this is it's flavourful and a monk would be grabbing strength anyhow. Also it helps the party to have a bare-hands-buzz-saw leading the charge. Certainly it frees up the Eidolon a little.
_
Panoptipal
Moon
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
RE: Pathfinder - Horror, Monsters, Adventure
_
_______Where are we... Let's see.
_______We've got three persons so far, Sirix, Godfang and Cherubian, and tentative interest from a fourth.
_______Pathfinder and Pulp Horror Adventure are solid. There's no particular agreement about kinks. I have two questions for those in the thread:
_______Would you still be interested in the game without sexual content? (This has more to do with recruiting than anything.)
_______Are you set about your concept and ready to start working out how your group gets together?
_______That's all for now.
_
_
_______Where are we... Let's see.
_______We've got three persons so far, Sirix, Godfang and Cherubian, and tentative interest from a fourth.
_______Pathfinder and Pulp Horror Adventure are solid. There's no particular agreement about kinks. I have two questions for those in the thread:
_______Would you still be interested in the game without sexual content? (This has more to do with recruiting than anything.)
_______Are you set about your concept and ready to start working out how your group gets together?
_______That's all for now.
_
Cherubian
Supernova
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2010
RE: Pathfinder - Horror, Monsters, Adventure
Sexual content for me is half of the draw of the game. It does not have to be force-crammed into the plot, but when an opportunity presents itself it should not be avoided, either. Basically let's have an adult game, and not a PG-13 one.
Besides that I am mostly ready, with only minor details to be ironed out which can be done as we go along.
Sexual content for me is half of the draw of the game. It does not have to be force-crammed into the plot, but when an opportunity presents itself it should not be avoided, either. Basically let's have an adult game, and not a PG-13 one.
Besides that I am mostly ready, with only minor details to be ironed out which can be done as we go along.
Panoptipal
Moon
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
RE: Pathfinder - Horror, Monsters, Adventure
_
_______Closed.
_
_
_______Closed.
_
Panoptipal
Moon
- Joined
- May 14, 2013
RE: Pathfinder - Horror, Monsters, Adventure
_
_______Unfortunately, due to an issue with the site I will be cutting this short. There are other concerns but this one is really a deal breaker for me doing anything here.
_______I apologize for the any disappointment and waste of time.
_
_______Unfortunately, due to an issue with the site I will be cutting this short. There are other concerns but this one is really a deal breaker for me doing anything here.
_______I apologize for the any disappointment and waste of time.