Your support makes Blue Moon possible (Patreon)After a long, long debate over the Free Use Act of 20XX...
...no, free use wasn't legalized everywhere. What do you think this is, some kind of erotic RP prompt?
Because it is, just not that kind. In this one, democracy prevailed, but democracy does seem to involve a lot of capitulations. Though legislation fully designating women as sexual public property proved to be logistically and fiscally impossible, the Men's Sexual Relief movement successfully argued their case for the proven societal benefit of on-demand access to sexual intercourse.
Said capitulations were then made: while from the neck up a woman was considered to be equal in the eyes of the law, the amended F.L.E.S.H.L.I.G.H.T.* Act reclassified women as public property available for sexual use below the neck—and to further narrow the scope, the only women subject to the act were deemed to be public college students who then would be tuition-free, leaving them with a debt to repay to society, and a collar around their necks advertising them as available for public use.
*Female Leasability Enhancing Sexual Health Legislation Intheinterestof Gentlemen everywHere
The change to society was quick.
* Language around sex began to shift: increasingly, sex with a free use girl was less viewed as sex and more as masturbation/"using" someone, with pussy being viewed as more of a luxury fleshlight than anything.
* Businesses began to advertise access to a free use girl as an amenity—you're more likely to visit a bar with a girl rigged up in the gents for use, or a gym where you can unwind with your trainer at the end or beginning of your class in a whole different way, and if someone's looking for a roommate, mentioning that there would be access to a free use girl included in the rent would make for a more appealing prospect.
* Private leasing agreements—designating a free use girl for one man's use only—though uncommon, were permissible, and though this would give a girl a break from serving the masses it would also mean being at one person's constant beck and call.
* Streamers who fell under the act began to have to change their mode of keeping a viewerbase—anyone who built their brand on being a tease would have to drop the act, wearing increasingly indecent costumes, dropping her coordinates in the chat for first come first serve use upon reaching viewership milestones, etc.
* The dating landscape abruptly changed; sex on the first date, or even on the initial meeting, was all but obligated, along with nudes on profiles on dating apps.
* Sexual education classes in college became a lot more hands-on.
Etc!
***
So! Here is a marginally (very) ridiculous prompt. I like a typical free use setup but this one really amps up the cognitive dissonance/objectification; girls having to deal with sort of being thought of as both equals and objects, how that might impact their existing relationships—depending on where we take this from there could be some interesting setups there. My read on how the girls feel about it is somewhere between depressing outright non-con and full enthusiastic consent; it's annoying, but it's the way the world is.
Only things I'm not particularly looking for with this prompt are: cuck (hotwife/"sharing" totally ok), really intense misogyny, incest (step ok), scat, snuff/violence, and F/F. Also not looking to connect outside of the prompt, obviously we're all here to have fun but for me it's a "writing erotica is fun" thing and not a r4r kind of situation.
Kinks that might be fun to also include are: body writing, ENF & CMNF, outfit control, risk of pregnancy, humiliation, bondage, stuck & fucked, forniphilia, etc.
Otherwise, if there are any kinks not mentioned or alluded to here, happy to talk about how we might work them in! Oral is tricky and sort of goes against the rules of the universe, but not opposed to it occasionally happening to occur in some way.
Shoot me a PM if you want to hash out an RP setup in this universe, just worldbuild a bit on the concept in general, or, idk, if you can come up with a better acronym than the above, which is probably likely.
...no, free use wasn't legalized everywhere. What do you think this is, some kind of erotic RP prompt?
Because it is, just not that kind. In this one, democracy prevailed, but democracy does seem to involve a lot of capitulations. Though legislation fully designating women as sexual public property proved to be logistically and fiscally impossible, the Men's Sexual Relief movement successfully argued their case for the proven societal benefit of on-demand access to sexual intercourse.
Said capitulations were then made: while from the neck up a woman was considered to be equal in the eyes of the law, the amended F.L.E.S.H.L.I.G.H.T.* Act reclassified women as public property available for sexual use below the neck—and to further narrow the scope, the only women subject to the act were deemed to be public college students who then would be tuition-free, leaving them with a debt to repay to society, and a collar around their necks advertising them as available for public use.
*Female Leasability Enhancing Sexual Health Legislation Intheinterestof Gentlemen everywHere
The change to society was quick.
* Language around sex began to shift: increasingly, sex with a free use girl was less viewed as sex and more as masturbation/"using" someone, with pussy being viewed as more of a luxury fleshlight than anything.
* Businesses began to advertise access to a free use girl as an amenity—you're more likely to visit a bar with a girl rigged up in the gents for use, or a gym where you can unwind with your trainer at the end or beginning of your class in a whole different way, and if someone's looking for a roommate, mentioning that there would be access to a free use girl included in the rent would make for a more appealing prospect.
* Private leasing agreements—designating a free use girl for one man's use only—though uncommon, were permissible, and though this would give a girl a break from serving the masses it would also mean being at one person's constant beck and call.
* Streamers who fell under the act began to have to change their mode of keeping a viewerbase—anyone who built their brand on being a tease would have to drop the act, wearing increasingly indecent costumes, dropping her coordinates in the chat for first come first serve use upon reaching viewership milestones, etc.
* The dating landscape abruptly changed; sex on the first date, or even on the initial meeting, was all but obligated, along with nudes on profiles on dating apps.
* Sexual education classes in college became a lot more hands-on.
Etc!
***
So! Here is a marginally (very) ridiculous prompt. I like a typical free use setup but this one really amps up the cognitive dissonance/objectification; girls having to deal with sort of being thought of as both equals and objects, how that might impact their existing relationships—depending on where we take this from there could be some interesting setups there. My read on how the girls feel about it is somewhere between depressing outright non-con and full enthusiastic consent; it's annoying, but it's the way the world is.
Only things I'm not particularly looking for with this prompt are: cuck (hotwife/"sharing" totally ok), really intense misogyny, incest (step ok), scat, snuff/violence, and F/F. Also not looking to connect outside of the prompt, obviously we're all here to have fun but for me it's a "writing erotica is fun" thing and not a r4r kind of situation.
Kinks that might be fun to also include are: body writing, ENF & CMNF, outfit control, risk of pregnancy, humiliation, bondage, stuck & fucked, forniphilia, etc.
Otherwise, if there are any kinks not mentioned or alluded to here, happy to talk about how we might work them in! Oral is tricky and sort of goes against the rules of the universe, but not opposed to it occasionally happening to occur in some way.
Shoot me a PM if you want to hash out an RP setup in this universe, just worldbuild a bit on the concept in general, or, idk, if you can come up with a better acronym than the above, which is probably likely.