And this is why I stopped trying to ERP on Discord. The servers there are chock full of these kinds of RTs... to the point where its just a wave of indistinguishable posts advertising the same topic over and over rand over......and there's a lot of people who have the expectation that all "chicks with dicks" will be 7'2" amazonian uber doms with a bitch-breaker the size of their femur who think of women and men alike as cum dumpsters and go insane if they don't climax seven times a day. ...which sounds INCREDIBLY specific but trust me; I've met SO MANY RPers with this exact expectation its a specific category in my mind. Then there's femboys and butches that are just men and women adopting behaviors and aesthetic from the other group, which get conflated under the whole non-binary/intersex umbrella making everything even more bloody confusing... ...and that's just the world we live in now.
True. Even on here, I THINK (I haven't actually checked, to be fair, I encourage you to contradict me if you find otherwise), I'm the only person who has an RT stating an interest for playing a futanari-type character that doesn't specify a desire to be the dominant in a given pairing.And this is why I stopped trying to ERP on Discord. The servers there are chock full of these kinds of RTs... to the point where its just a wave of indistinguishable posts advertising the same topic over and over rand over...
I wouldn't know, tbh. Futas aren't an element I ever really seek out for roleplaying. Not my cup of tea.True. Even on here, I THINK (I haven't actually checked, to be fair, I encourage you to contradict me if you find otherwise), I'm the only person who has an RT stating an interest for playing a futanari-type character that doesn't specify a desire to be the dominant in a given pairing.
Personally, I don't equate Futas to irl Trans people. To me, Futas are a fantastical derivative of online hentai/porn and ERP (which is EXACTLY why their definition is so nebulous). I don't measure them up against real people in the slightest. Honestly, I would find it quite strange if someone told me they identified as a Futanari. It would be on much the same level if they told me they identified as a Tiefling.I'm not going to hijack this conversation with my soapbox again, since it's still public even if the thread had to be locked, but I do want to touch on this briefly: there are people, primarily trans people, who will not engage with someone who uses words that reduce them to a fetish; my list is shemale, futa, and tranny. (Clarification, this is my choice and opinion, I'm not really asking for what others think about my choices. Don't make this thread into that one.). Just something to consider for everyone when making a thread!
But I will say that the concept of a futanari character varies wildly from person to person, even on this site. As other people have mentioned, it's their gender determination that matters.
Personally, I don't equate Futas to irl Trans people. To me, Futas are a fantastical derivative of online hentai/porn and ERP. I don't measure them up against real people in the slightest.
and most go to the FEMALES SEEKING part to look for Female characters with a pussy and with breasts. Yes, logic follows.I think the gist of what everyone is basically on the same page about, is that it kinda doesn't matter where you decide to place the RT. The Futanari is fantastical, so if you wanna call it a Male, put it in male. If you wanna call it a female, put it in female. But for reasons of making it less complicated, the Non-Binary is probably the best place.
I think I know where the issue lies. And I hope I don't inadvertently step on any toes here. But there seems to be this blurred line of where "Males" and "Females" belong because of character "gender identification" versus their Sex organs. See, when I go and look through the MALES SEEKING part of the site, it's because I'm looking for an RT featuring Characters that identifies as Male and has a penis and doesn't have Mammaries. If the character in question identified as Male but did not have a penis and instead had big whopping tits, well... that's definitely NOT what I would expect in that section. And I imagine that if a bunch of penis-less characters with breasts identifying as Males became the Meta, then the sub-Sections might need a better re-wording so that we could properly divvie up Males with penises and Males without them.... because, let's face it, most of us go to the MALES SEEKING part to look for Male characters with a cock and without breasts.
Yes... I agree, but didn't think it needed be obviously outlined as the implied counterpart to my statement.and most go to the FEMALES SEEKING part to look for Female characters with a pussy and with breasts. Yes, logic follows.
yeah, I don't think I've ever seen anyone advert with a Futa character that has a flaccid and malformed pen-gina. X_xI think futanari in the sense of an individual who is female in appearance and has a functional penis and vagina is where the "fantastical" lies. I have done research in that regard, and cannot cite a single real life example of a human who fits all those traits.
But for reasons of making it less complicated, the Non-Binary is probably the best place.
With that logic, same should also go the other way round: people posting in the male and female forums as cis should state exactly what they want so that people who aren't looking for that can click off. Is it really the cis posters who need things made more convenient for them? If one every ten or twenty request threads there happened to be by someone who wants to play a male/female character that has a futa body, is it that big of a deal for people who are looking for traditional cis characters, even if it's not clearly stated in the title?I do generally agree with this. I think most people have a very specific idea of what they're looking for when they go to the male or female roleplay requests, whereas the nonbinary requests can encompass a lot more stuff that is seen as less 'traditional' without stepping on any toes. However, I don't mind if people want to put their futa main character in the female section anyway, so long as they make it clear exactly what they're looking to play as so that people who aren't looking for that can click off.
Hey, I don't think you were intending to be transphobic, but this definitely read that way to me. Would you mind clarifying?I don't think I've ever seen anyone advert with a Futa character that has a flaccid and malformed pen-gina. X_x
I agree with this statement and wish to add to it. Futa has come to be a handy shorthand for the intersex character archetype of a male with female genitalia "otokonoko" and, more commonly, a female with male genitalia "futa(nari)". I find myself using it as a shorthand myself rather than go into elaboration about the specific sub-type of character falling under the intersex umbrella I wish to portray. However, it is of note to remember that while it is the common usage, Futanari is not a word that originated from hentai.- we cannot discount the fact that there are inherent tendencies in some subforums. the nonbinary subforum tends to gravitate towards hentai tropes. and i'm not hating on hentai tropes. i am admittedly a degen and find quite a few of those very amusing. but generally speaking, i'm looking to write something with more realism than hentai tropes. i've written a lot of different things, but definitely gravitate to sapphic, and the roleplay requests by females section tend to be more fitting for what i'm looking for. so like throwing my two cents into the conversation - i write a lot of women with pp without the trans experience. to me, it's just as much an unrealistic fantasy thing as throwing a fireball is. it's not any deeper than that
interesting! i did not know this. thanks for sharing!I agree with this statement and wish to add to it. Futa has come to be a handy shorthand for the intersex character archetype of a male with female genitalia "otokonoko" and, more commonly, a female with male genitalia "futa(nari)". I find myself using it as a shorthand myself rather than go into elaboration about the specific sub-type of character falling under the intersex umbrella I wish to portray. However, it is of note to remember that while it is the common usage, Futanari is not a word that originated from hentai.
According to "Onnagata: A Labyrinth of Gendering in Kabuki Theater", futanari appears as a medical condition in a 12th-century scroll, The Book of Disease. Here, futanari describes a person with male and female genitals, which we might now call intersex. In Japanese, futa means "two" and nari means "figure," which refers to such a person's perceived dual nature.
In the 17th century, the pathological term gave way to an aesthetic called futanarihira. Narihira was a poet noted for his beauty, and so futanarihira (combining his name with futanari), is sometimes translated as "androgynous beauties" or "androgynous stunners." These were male Kabuki actors who, according to the Nikkei Times, played both male and female roles.
Futa hentai became popular as late as the 1990s. The Japan Times describes the typical futanari character as "endowed with feminine curves, voluptuous breasts and a virile penis," though the terminology is applied so broadly and haphazardly among western audiences as to lose its original meaning even in the medium, and such characters have been portrayed predating hentai in both Japanese and international media, myth, and medical history. What's more, the definition submitted by The Japan Times is no longer entirely satisfactory, as many characters who fall under the umbrella terms lack the voluptuous breasts, or virility of the penis, which were originally common to the archetype.